It's nice to hear that other people really liked it. Definitely highlights the breadth of approaches and styles that Stephenson has.
1,259 karma · joined May 6, 2009
Contact: <HN username> + "x" @ gmail
It's nice to hear that other people really liked it. Definitely highlights the breadth of approaches and styles that Stephenson has.
There's a segment where the various staff/producers all try to imitate Reid's style, and then apply the voice transfer model to here their impression in his voice.
I've also used an open source TTS model conditioned on an actor whose voice I like to read the transcript from a podcast host whose voice I have a hard time tolerating. Here's where you start to edge closer to possible racism, echo chambering, etc. It's certainly a gray area, and I haven't navigated the moral shoals and reefs of replacing one voice with another* I like more – which is why I won't publish anything about how I did it.
(*A random sample: Better to not listen to what a person has to say, or to listen to your voice-cloned version of their words? What about if you literally can't understand them? Non-native speakers already rewrite their words using ChatGPT. Possibly (likely) only okay if they do it themselves...)
Do you have any personal experience with the results?
Even though it gave a lot of great structured options, missing even a single sentence was unforgivable to me. I went with Nougat instead, for arxiv papers.
(Also check out Marker (mentioned on hn in the last month) for pretty high fidelity paper conversion to markdown. Does reasonable job with equations too.)
So 45 billion parameters is what they consider their "small" model? I'm excited to see what/if their larger models will be.
My new goal is to figure out how to get all this heavy metal accumulation out of me (I've been eating heavy dark chocolate regularly for years), and find ways I can keep eating chocolate without absorbing more. Some studies I've read mention that tomatoes might help prevent heavy metal absorption when consumed with the source.
Eagerly anticipating this game has brought me back to my childhood days when playing the game I wanted seems like the ultimate fun, but of course now I have responsibilities. Now playing is a reward for myself if I handle everything else and again, only with friends. Even though I've been tempted dozens of times in the last month to fire it up for a solo session, that rule has stood me in good stead.
Thankfully, the Apple Silicon machines are powerful enough to support many modern games. I'm currently (and happily) playing Baldur's Gate 3 using Wineskin on my M1 MBP with no problems. So far no bugs, and multiplayer with PC users works great.
I don't disagree that it's a good and moral thing to offer, I'm just curious about where these universally agreed upon "basic human rights" come from?
ie. "Given a world X is true, I would expect to see Y. Since I don't see Y, that's at least weak evidence that X may not be true."
There are of course plenty of other reasons why you wouldn't see Y, but it's at least some kind of signal.
I use purple air zoomed out combined with windy.com to generate my own smoke predictions, it's worked pretty well for me.
One minor point: In your demo, you state that "Today, almost 50% of code is written by AI, so why shouldn't you learn how to code with AI?"
Citation? I thought this might be true of developers using Copilot (based on their recent publications), but even that seems a bit of a stretch. I guess you could claim this because it's so easy to generate LOTS of code with an AI model. How much of that code is used, though? Really 50% of ALL code written now?
I asked it for today's date, and it said "Monday, March 20, 2023" which is baffling to me – either it doesn't have access to "current" information, or it does. But off by one?
"What is the knowledge cutoff of your training data?" > My training data was cut off in September 2021. This means that I do not have access to any information that was published after that date. However, I am able to access and process information that was published before that date.
Then I tried to get it to help me with finding some papers, but it continuously misinterpreted my prompts, or gave me lackluster results.
Back to GPT I go.
I like the idea of the service, but wouldn't use it unless I can run it on Mac. Streaming for indie games would be perfection, as I don't have the time to go deep into a AAA title but would love to quickly start up some cool short indie game on demand.
I'm not sure if this outweighs the different reading experience, but that ability makes for something which is fundamentally different, rather than being a strictly worse version of a blog.
I've written a lot of Python, taught classes in it, deployed production code... and I still feel a semi-conscious urge to reach for something else whenever I contemplate starting a new project. Something about its approach, syntax, common idioms, always feels just a tad clunkier to me than I'd prefer. The whitespace makes it hard to paste lines into my repl, and (probably the biggest thing) comprehensions ARE NOT SUFFICIENT replacements for easy anonymous inline functions (JS () => , or Ruby's blocks).
I like dynamic languages, I really like the advances in tooling with type checking and LSP support. I like dynamic notebooks (either inline in VS Code #%%, or straight Jupyter), the massive package ecosystem (but obviously hate the actual packaging tools), cool tools like Rich... but it just doesn't make me as happy to use as other languages.
I'm still trying to articulate why. Maybe I was just ruined by learning Ruby first.
I've read most of Sanderson's books in print, but for this one I also bought the audiobook specifically for that kind of narration.
We can lower risk, but it seems that no level of caution is truly enough, given that others don't care. I'm really not sure what to do – we don't want to keep getting it, but we really want some sense of social life back. My wife and I keep wondering / looking if there's anywhere in the world where people by and large take this infection seriously. I suspect it will come down to small communities, rather than states or countries.
My impression was that increased exposure to toxic compounds (microplastics, estrogen mimicking compounds, etc) has been contributing to declining sperm counts / motility, and things like earlier onset of puberty in women.
Wouldn't those at least have some effect on sex drive? I'm looking in particular at the decrease in adolescent masturbation, as it's hard for me to imagine that "increased video gaming" is a culprit for this.