psnehanshu

Thanks for pointing out these points. The people who are planning to ditch a smartphone completely, please explain how are you going to overcome these problems.

Then atleast use JSDoc. Type definitions greatly help the users of your package.

I heard that here https://youtu.be/1kJf4krMY4A?si=7vNSBNrU8f-rqJBp

Junta

New shiny things are on the market, so dump the good old tool that works. Typical junior mindset.

Cloudflare just published a resolution 7 minutes ago.

Do you have the self hosted OTA open-sourced? I tried implementating it, but it didn't work for some reason.

Yes, but only half

Triple Triple O dot Triple O - cool name.

Yes, but then just use CSS.

These websites have no individual identity, they all look the same.

I love DBeaver too.

Yes, because US is the world. Other countries are alien civilizations.

> If a product offers something and suddenly makes it product progressively inferior...

The inferior experience in terms of YouTube is the increase in ads. I like to think of it as a price increase due to inflation.

> It feels scummy since it didn't start with "first X are free" and shows a lack of upfront monetization strategy.

That's a standard practice actually. I have seen new restaurants offer food for free on the day of opening to attract customers and then charge from next day onwards. They will also gradually keep increasing their prices to cope up with inflation and/or other reasons.

> It's highly objective if you actually use arguments, which you don't.

Treating your preference as objective just shows how much disconnected you are from the reality. In my country, YouTube is the goto choice for music. Moreover, YouTube ads are skipable, but Spotify ads aren't.

> Using the term piracy here is playing into the game of anti competitive companies who continually lobby governments to get their way over the actual desires of citizens.

Desires of citizens like you is to get everything for free. That's what I have understood.

> You haven't really supported your quasi marketing campaign claims about the YouTube experience.

Your happy customers are your best marketers.

> Truth is: They had a product that was good. Made it shitty and told you to pay if you want what you had. You pay and laud it.

I agree, they did make the product shitty for free users. But that won't make me and many others stop using it.

> Premium subscription is just an antipattern of them removing options.

It makes sense only if you believe everything on the internet should be free.

> YouTube music is in no way better than Spotify.

I don't disagree. It's highly subjective.

> The benefits you site are possible without their premium, using other apps

Piracy is always an option. But if you choose not to do it, buying premium makes sense.

This looks to me like a sane comment. No idea why this was downvoted.

I watch a lot of YouTube and I have premium subscription. I believe it is worth it for me. Yes I can use adblockers, but the premium experience is just better. It also comes with YouTube music which is much better than Spotify and others. There are other benefits like watch queue, background play on phone.

What? Never knew this.

You probably work for a service based IT company where they kept you on bench.

Sure, but the parent is speaking about how it is difficult for tooling to present with options when it doesn't know which table to select from.

Even if you tried 100 times to defend your comment, I would still think you were being dismissive. So don't waste your time defending.

Post about Reddit API pricing and the Apollo app https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36141083

I haven't tried the package yet, but at first glance it is missing the .d.ts file. Is this package type safe?

Ofcourse, this was just an example. One of the prod solutions can be Nginx.

I disagree with your argument, but I won't reply to that as there are other replies I agree with.

However, where did you find the steps to install this with Docker? I can't find it.

It won't matter as long as you are using regular `a` tags for links. You anyway don't want robots to submit forms and perform any actions that are meant for users.

What are the main complaints about your link syntax invention?

Now it makes sense, thanks for the explanation.

> world before markdown and not wanting to embed html in the page

Wdym

I noticed that all the links in these sites are CapitalizedWithoutSpaces. Why is that?