1,216 karma · joined April 5, 2015
In most countries, they are appointed.
Source (in French): http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2016/08/22/la-commissi...
I know about BBC News in the UK, and in France, there are now 4, and soon, 5 (BFMtv, ITele, LCI, France 24, France Info).
The main news channel in France: http://www.bfmtv.com/mediaplayer/live-video/
> The only thing that has changed that the money that formerly took a detour to EU now goes directly from the Swiss government to the Swiss labs.
Switzerland labs are actually performing very well, and get more money from the EU research budget than what Switzerland gives to the EU budget (net gain of CHF 219 millions according to http://www.sbfi.admin.ch/aktuell/medien/00483/00586/index.ht... )
International collaboration is beneficial: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexitvote/2015/12/05/debunking-the-m...
Yes, you can collaborate without a specific grant, but in my experience, it makes the collaboration easier.
The Nature Index (http://www.natureindex.com/annual-tables/2016/institution/al... ) has CNRS 3rd, then the Max Planck institutes 4th, and the first British one, Oxford, is 7th.
Can you give references? Preferably not only one anecdotical example, and with comparisons with state development funds (especially from the UK).
Research needs international collaboration, and UK funding only would make it more difficult.
Young drivers are also really more likely to have a car accident (ask car insurance), not because they are this age or that age, but because they less experienced.
Sport-related accident for instance. Especially ski accidents... and Austria is a land of mountains, and ski is very popular there.
Young people are more generally more likely to have accidents. Car-accident are also more prevalent (drinking...).
In reality,in History, professors may be slightly engaged politically, and some students as well, but most are rather struggling to figure out what kind of jobs they are going to do after their studies.
http://ec.europa.eu/transport/facts-fundings/studies/doc/201...
"European policy measures began to be introduced, leading to the present day situation, where Directive 2000/84/EC requires Member States to put their clocks forward one hour on the last Sunday of March and change them back on the last Sunday of October each year."
And 11.2 (page 10): "The cumulative effect of this succession of laws is that all Member States are now obliged to observe summertime, starting it on the last Sunday of March and ending it on the last Sunday of October."
But as the UK is apparently leaving the EU, staying on BST will be possible...
[EDIT, typo: US -> UK]
Any prospect about that?
These languages have evolved during centuries and continue to evolve, whereas the metric system was built purposefully for simplicity. The equivalent of the metric system would be something like Esperanto. English is as archaic and complicated as the customary system for measurement.
For instance, I am puzzled by the affirmation about Fahrenheit. Cooking very often uses water and Celsius having a scale based on that. I'm not sure that having a scale with the highest temperature based on the temperature of horse blood is much more relevant in every day life...
And so on for the other measurements...
Usefulness is not a relevant question for measurements, because we can always find real life objects to make these more visible (for instance, one long step is for me about 1 meter).