2,574 karma · joined December 24, 2013
So no matter how good their model is, it's useless to most of the regular users.
https://www.gigabyte.com/in/Enterprise/Tower-Server/W775-V10...
Also I don't think many non programmers will even know "rm -rf" command and what it does. So even if a non programmer was doing it command by command by giving permissions, he/she will have a hard time figuring out what those commands do.
If I can keep adding new features without introducing big regressions that is good design and good code quality. (Of course there will come a time when it will not be possible and it will need a rewrite. Same like software created by top paid developers from the best universities.)
As long as we can keep new bugs to the same level as hand written code with LLM written code, I think, LLMs writing code is much superior just because of the speed with which it allows us to implement features.
We write software to solve (mostly) business efficiency problems. The businesses which will solve those problems faster than their competitors will win.
People using LLMs to code these days is similar to how majority people stopped using assembly and moved to C and C++, then to garbage collected languages and dynamically typed languages. People were always looking for ways to make programmers more productive.
Programming is evolving. LLMs are just next generation programming tools. They make programmers more productive and in majority of the cases people and companies are going to use them more and more.
Quality of the software comes from testing. Humans and LLMs both make mistakes while coding.
In such cases the person says, I have built this building. People who found companies, say they have built companies. It's commonly accepted in our society.
So even if Claude built for it for GP, as long as GP designed it, paid for tools (Claude) to build it, also tested it to make sure that it works, I personally think, he has right to say he has built it.
If you don't like it, you are not required to use it.
I don't think the Judge is equipped to handle this case if they don't understand how their order jeopardies the privacy of millions of users worldwide who don't even care about NYT's content or bypassing their paywalls.
Becuase they are bound by their terms of service? Because if they won't no business would ever use their service and without businesses using their service they won't have any revenue?
Many apps that make hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue and have millions of users are built on cross platform technologies. (IntelliJ IDEs for example, and many Mobile apps which use same code for iOS and Android, Cursor, VS Code, etc). People use these apps even though they are not platform native and some of them have die hard fans too.
Kudos to the CogentCore team to build and ship this! Looks like this is made by a 2 people team. That's a lot of work to pull off!
I personally wanted something like this for Go for a while! Will try it out.
Q: who won the cricket worldcup 2023?
A: The *2023 ICC Cricket World Cup* was won by *Australia*. They defeated *New Zealand* in the final on *November 19, 2023*, at the *M. A. Chidambaram Stadium in Chennai, India*.
### Key Details: - *Final Score*: Australia scored *334/5* in their 50 overs, while New Zealand reached *199/8* in their chase. - *Man of the Match*: Pat Cummins (Australia) with 5 wickets for 34 runs. - *Tournament Host*: India. - *Notable Performance*: Australia's aggressive batting and disciplined bowling sealed the victory, marking their *sixth Cricket World Cup title* (tying them with West Indies for the most titles).
This was the 13th edition of the ICC Cricket World Cup (50-over format). The T20 World Cup is a separate tournament, with India winning the 2024 edition. Let me know if you need further details!
total duration: 34.911890735s load duration: 65.034584ms prompt eval count: 20 token(s) prompt eval duration: 305.460537ms prompt eval rate: 65.47 tokens/s eval count: 511 token(s) eval duration: 34.539660654s eval rate: 14.79 tokens/s
Comment: Wrong - https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/icc-cricket-world-cup-20...
Q: give last 10 movies to win the oscar best picture award
Here is a clear and accurate list of the *last 10 Best Picture winners* at the Academy Awards, from *2014 to 2023*, including the ceremony year, the winning film, and the film's release year:
---
1. *2023 (95th Oscars)* - *Winner*: Everything Everywhere All at Once - *Release Year*: 2022
2. *2022 (94th Oscars)* - *Winner*: The Power of the Dog - *Release Year*: 2021
3. *2021 (93rd Oscars)* - *Winner*: Nomadland - *Release Year*: 2020
4. *2020 (92nd Oscars)* - *Winner*: Parasite - *Release Year*: 2019
5. *2019 (91st Oscars)* - *Winner*: Green Book - *Release Year*: 2018
6. *2018 (90th Oscars)* - *Winner*: The Shape of Water - *Release Year*: 2017
7. *2017 (89th Oscars)* - *Winner*: Moonlight - *Release Year*: 2016
8. *2016 (88th Oscars)* - *Winner*: Spotlight - *Release Year*: 2015
9. *2015 (87th Oscars)* - *Winner*: 12 Years a Slave - *Release Year*: 2013
10. *2014 (86th Oscars)* - *Winner*: Argo - *Release Year*: 2012
Comment: Answer number 2 ans 9 are wrong. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award_for_Best_Picture)
I would have expected it to get things which are such big events right at least.
AGPL? https://github.com/wild-card-ai/agents-json/blob/master/LICE...