1,836 karma · joined June 10, 2020
Hence, I'm working on http://diffudle.com/ which is a mix of Wheel Of Fortune + Stable Diffusion + Wordle. I Can't figure it out but feels to me like its lacking something.
I understand all the data must be hashed before storing using a "central key". But this just means delegating the power to the key holder. Am I missing something?
You can see that even though amazon mass hires candidates, they still have to shell out more salaries than say Google and Microsoft. It’s easier to fix bad salary+good wlb reputation (by increasing salary) than fixing good salary + bad wlb reputation (idk how they can even do it).
Created the whole site with complete Auth, Billing etc but lost interest when tried to actually market it. I started creating this when I saw someone make >10k$ launching something similar on producthunt. I thought I can make some ez money too.
https://headlineheroapp.herokuapp.com/
Edit: Buy Now won't work because Stripe credentials are expired.
Because you asked them question out of syllabus. Was the person informed that the interview wouldn't involve Leetcode?
The person spent months prepping Leetcode just to get into BigTech and then you come out of woodwork with your "special" interviewing material. Imagine prepping for a calculus test for months and then the teacher comes out and takes a "simple" test on trignometry. Would you be able to do it? Not only that, all his/her friends got a normal calculus test which they passed with flying colors.
1. In both automated leetcode and automated "coding" interviews, most people get full score. This even turns into a negative bias as an actual good candidate who did not cheat has greater chance of getting rejected here than the cheaters.
2. Interviewers put both automated leetcode and in-person leetcode to first filter out candidates, then put them through actual interview hoops. If your product succeeds, this means another layer of "interviewing" and more wastage of engineer's time.
Sorry to say this isn't solving any problem but has the potential to create more harm for both sides.
74 snapshots since 2018. The specific radiation map has been snapshotted yesterday only which seems concerning.
I'm still reading research papers to figure what's the best way to approach this problem. This is just the first step and I'll see what can be done regarding collecting data later on.
2. >By this time they were 100% cultists, so they all consulted the rock and said “No, the volcano is not erupting”. The sulfur started to smell different, and the Queen asked “Are you sure?”
Even the queen deciphered that something is wrong without any volcano knowledge. The author itself is providing an example of human instinct without acknowledging it,
3. The author assumes all guards as the same when in fact they all are different individuals. Sure most of them might be lousy at their jobs but there will be some who understand how rare the "robbery event" is and so will still look when there's sound.
4. The examples suffer from cold start problem. What if robbery happens the first month of a new guard. Will he still be asleep? If not, then Utility (hiring a guard in all cases) > Utility (not hiring a guard).
5. As another commentor mentioned that the value of having a security guard visible so that 99% of the robbers who might conceivably want to rob decides to go someplace else instead.
6. Contrarionism is seen as a virtue by certain people hence "I don't like this generation's music" and "Popular thing bad" phenomenon. Also, they make sure to be as loud as possible whenever their contradiction is right. This helps humanity in mentally modelling rare events.
All in all, the author is underestimating the capabilities of humans and humanity.