poly2it

For some reason I find Claude's writing often has an oddly condescending tone when it tries to be empathetic.

I don't understand why a photosensing pixel is meaningfully worse for privacy than the devices we already have. I mean, sure, you might not as easily be able to cover up your camera with tape, but even then a better solution which should be implemented anyway is a physical decoupling.

And as I stated above, I doubt this is meaningful for spying capabilities. Micro cameras are likely more suitable, for better or worse.

Phone screens without notches, laptops which can have larger cameras for better video calls, VR gear with better eye tracking, digital mirrors and more. I'm sure there are less obvious applications.

Can you be more precise about what scenario you are envisioning?

Is this really as detrimental to privacy as other comments claim? There are already very small cameras which can be used for adversarial purposes. This technology could be useful for many utilitarian purposes.

Question: are OÜs particularly beneficial even for non-Estonians (EU), and in what way?

I think that was Citra emulator. Protect Dolphin at all costs!

Nintendo (among other creative corporations) do not seem to realise that invite to play creates an attachment to the product that is deeper than a license agreement, which is our shared cultural filament.

This is insanely promising. What a time to be alive!

I don't see how this is AI-written?

Does anybody have an understanding of when realistically there will be supply again? I've heard some positive sentiment about new developments in China, but that's not a market I am familiar with, and I haven't witnessed any effects of it thus far.

Did you go into tech because you love software or for the money?

Do you search the name of the photographer every time you download a creative commons image? The vast majority of people simply do not care about copyright.

I would assume it also has to do with if not fundamentally manifesting from Steam being an organisation of technologists. They don't want to put out a project which has a worse operating system than their workstations.

No average pilot.

Just one more minister, I promise you, just one more and all politics will resolve. Come on, just one more and it will fix everything. Please just one more. One more minister and we can fix the whole problem.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/one-more-lane-bro-one-more-la...

Does that imply that people with age actually interpret pitches differently? The pitch reading would be correct "locally", within your brain.

Pitch perception shifts with age?

FYI, PojavLauncher has been succeeded by https://github.com/AngelAuraMC.

It's really difficult to view Go as a serious language when fundamental design decisions such as this one have seemingly been glossed over. It's in a precarious spot, on the one hand cushioning the C it wants to resemble, but on the other hand not yielding any capable tools or abstractions which could otherwise be unlocked via the safe architecture. Go developers seem uninterested in language design.

No, there would not have been and this is most likely not the reason. size_t exists for precisely this use case. It has existed since C89.

I can't stand Claude's "honesty". Anthropic should hire some writers and linguists to make the output a bit more bearable. It's mentally taxing to read this type of dull text for hours every day.

This leaves out part of the clause.

  All identifiers that begin with an underscore are reserved for use as identifiers with file scope in both the ordinary and tag name spaces.

Single underscore followed by non-uppercase is allowed, but not in file scope. This means that you can use them in structs and as local variables, but never as globals.

Is there any open model that can emulate the agentic experience you get with Opus 4.7?

I'm not in HFT, but I assume this is also an interesting applicable domain?

On topic of hidden files: wherefrom is the pattern of treating configuration files as hidden? I'm referring to the pattern of `.configfile` -- I mean, for code projects, a local config file is a first-level construct. This leads to hidden files being not being a viable construct, as there is no longer any consensus on what should be hidden.

Is this poor man's Nix/direnv, or does it do anything else?

I'm wondering who's paying for this. Is it becoming a part of the iCloud subscription? A separate billed product?

Why was this posted to HN? What an utter waste of time. Someone's slopwriter writes a slop article about which slopper slops the most slopulicious slop. Comments agree it's a bogus "study". We need some gate on AI-written articles. It's so weird that AI-written comments are not permitted, while the front page can be occupied by stuff like this.

That's precisely the issue, the power dynamic needs to flip. The state of USA and more worryingly the direction it is in is horrifying.