9 karma · joined August 20, 2026
(Genuine Q. I don't know anything about what biodiversity folk look for.)
If people don't want CCTV, campaign to make it illegal.
Humanity has a cost on nature, that should be mitigated.
Humans like domestic cats, which is one contributor to the overall human-induced reduction in biodiversity.
I wonder also whether there's something about towns/cities that makes birds flourish, compared to other wild animals.
This is the cost to splitting your routing between layer 3 and 4.
I'm now IPv6 everywhere, and so I get to just use ping. Much simpler.
Further, protecting IPv6 services is simpler, because I can terminate (m)TLS on the backend. With a reverse proxy on another host, I have to have yet another means of securing the proxy-backend path. Yet more complexity!
> And the fact that consumers can't just directly connect to each other is a feature.
Consumers should be protected by firewalls. That's independent of routing.
hrdx looks great, but as it does it's own multiplexing, I'm not sure the post's rationale is suggesting something like hrdx.
It took me about 20-30 re-reads of the first page to understand it.
The rest of the chapter was then a bit easier. I gave up after that.
But it really is a great idea in the first few pages.
Wow, I hadn't considered that final point.