269 karma · joined April 23, 2018
Of course it's only an issue now when the opposite is true, and is costing Amazon rather than the employees.
- buy tickets (with easy explanations of when/where they're valid)
- see which platform a train will depart from/arrive at
- check delays
- see walking times between platforms
- bus connections info
- handles refunds
- etc.
It works across Europe (elsewhere, I'm not sure), but in my experience it's got the most functionality within the UK.
The app itself is fantastic too. I'm not exaggerating when I say it is one of my favourite pieces of software - it does 1 thing, and does it super well. It's fast: no fluff, no ads. Few apps on my phone are like that anymore.
I'm confused - can this be used as a simple cloud storage platform, or are there limits on how often you can upload/download data? If I can SSH into it at any time, why not use this over other storage providers?
I don't want to turn this into an Android vs iOS debate, but want to highlight that one of the main complaints against getting an iPhone (cost) no longer really applies - it could even be considered a strongsuit. I agree that the walled garden can be annoying, but I've rarely found myself longing for Android customisation, and have very much noticed how some apps work much better on my iPhone. This is completely down to preference though.
I also care deeply about privacy, but even with 0 consideration for it, I think I still would've switched - I am super happy seeing Apple pushing it this hard.
(I recently went back to iOS after 2 phones and 5 years on Android)
The article itself only really talks about this connection in a single paragraph, the rest of it dedicated to general issues around vitamin D deficiencies - I don't personally know how big a problem this actually is, but the fact that 1 small paper said it helps with COVID isn't a reason for it to now be "shouted from the rooftops".
In the sentence following this advice, a different (published) paper is referenced [1]: "A new article by a long list of medical experts in the BMJ cautiously agrees", but as they then quote, the only result that paper gives in reference to COVID is that stay-at-home orders may increase vitamin D deficiencies. Though not outright malicious, to me it read like the article was trying to gain credibility by quoting a published paper which talks about vitamin D and COVID together, even if unrelated to a possible vitamin D-COVID connection. Though this might just be me.
Either way, I don't see this "growing evidence" from the article - if it was titled different, and only mentioned [0] in passing (but even better, not at all), I'd have less of a problem with it, but it's implying that a link between vitamin D deficiency and COVID is there and is significant, when both these things are pretty much still unknown.
[0] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.08.20095893v...
[1] https://nutrition.bmj.com/content/bmjnph/early/2020/05/13/bm...
I'm currently working through the Algorithms chapter, which builds up from Deutsch's Algorithm [2] all the way to Shor's Factoring Algorithm [3], but I will definitely end up going through most of the chapters.
[1] https://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Computing-Computer-Scientists...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsch%E2%80%93Jozsa_algorith...
It's really no more than a few lines of code to respect user's privacy, and if you're collecting significantly more user data then you should be handling it with care.
But he is right about it in Italy - no prescription required.
Is there anyone here with Lombok experience that wants to share any issues they've run into while using it? All I can think of right now is the fact that the source code isn't compatible with Java.
What Portugal showed was that punishing them is actually counterproductive.
I don't think making the data more available to users means it's now inherently less safe - actually, it could be argued that having all the data in one place makes it easier to protect ('Keep all your eggs in one basket, and put that basket in Fort Knox'). Additionally, if PII isn't stored securely enough, as it should, and that data gets breached, the company is at fault - again, which it should. Making these companies more liable incentivises them to take their security more seriously, which I think is good.
(I also trust my government, but that's a separate argument)