6,077 karma · joined April 24, 2011
Whether they do so in return for services rendered or are extracting rents by acting as gatekeepers is a question that never quite gets resolved. A little of each I suspect, depending on the context.
A proximity fused AD missile with a fragmentation charge will explode to the rear of a large airliner if it’s tail-chasing, resulting in exactly the kind of damage we see in both that IL-2 and this case.
They usually make the bug reports public eventually.
Mine are. Although it probably helps to have a static IP with a 25 year long clean history.
Are there very occasional glitches? Sure. But I've seen ISPs drop everything from GMail on the floor for no obvious reason. I've seen GMail drop GMail email before. Same for every other large email provider.
To date I haven't seen any reason strong enough to push me to switch to a centralised email host. That day may yet come of course.
Exactly! This is an even better phrasing of my point.
If it wasn’t a period, it would be something else & you’d have to handle that instead.
He used to be hostmaster@cam.ac.uk, amongst other things. Why he’s farming internet points on HN I’ve no idea!
Which is a little on the nose for the way artists are feeling right now...
IIRC the original detection was because sshd was using a lot more CPU coping with the torrent of spam connections any sshd on the internet gets than it usually would.
The people who have reverse engineered the code say it also requires the command message to be bound to the ssh host key as well, so if the host key is an RSA key then it might be doing an extra RSA decryption operation on every connection as well?
That would probably do it.
Calling the other two "remakes" seems unnecessarily reductive imo.
I don’t know how widely this DHCP RFC is supported though.
https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp?tab=readme-ov-file#qu...
Sneaky.
Maybe they’re expecting a 5.6.x release shortly that fixes all these issues & don’t want to add an epoch for a very short term packaging issue?
commit af071ef7702debef4f1d324616a0137a5001c14c (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Author: Jia Tan <jiat0218@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Mar 26 01:50:02 2024 +0800
Docs: Simplify SECURITY.md.
diff --git a/.github/SECURITY.md b/.github/SECURITY.md
index e9b3458a..9ddfe8e9 100644
--- a/.github/SECURITY.md
+++ b/.github/SECURITY.md
@@ -16,13 +16,7 @@ the chance that the exploit will be used before a patch is released.
You may submit a report by emailing us at
[xz@tukaani.org](mailto:xz@tukaani.org), or through
[Security Advisories](https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz/security/advisories/new).
-While both options are available, we prefer email. In any case, please
-provide a clear description of the vulnerability including:
-
-- Affected versions of XZ Utils
-- Estimated severity (low, moderate, high, critical)
-- Steps to recreate the vulnerability
-- All relevant files (core dumps, build logs, input files, etc.)
+While both options are available, we prefer email.
This project is maintained by a team of volunteers on a reasonable-effort
basis. As such, please give us 90 days to work on a fix before
If they're designed to stop a bulk carrier then presumably they can stop a container ship.
It’s just another rest webapp internally I think.
However, sometime around then it stopped launching the bundled browser & started launching the system browser to talk to the webserver that runs in the background & manages the local storage (SQLite IIRC) and communications with HMRC themselves.
So my first guess, if it isn’t working for you, would be to test whether xdg-open does the right thing on your system.
A year or two ago it stopped working entirely due to a libc mismatch, which I had to fix by patching in a more recent libc. That was less fun.