[0]: https://www.php.net/manual/en/language.generators.overview.p...
551 karma · joined March 20, 2016
E-mail: My username [at - without these brackets] Google Mail service com
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/piotrkubisa; my proof: https://keybase.io/piotrkubisa/sigs/48OF4qNZeEa0cZsAgANWMKn9vJZuQurNeBlQnl9rjDQ ]
[0]: https://www.php.net/manual/en/language.generators.overview.p...
[0]: https://symfony.com/doc/current/doctrine.html
[1]: https://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrine-orm/en/2....
> [...] I found the documentation to be sparse and the software ultimately non-functional.
Yes, my first take on the documentation was the same - existing but hard to understand in first proof-read. As I implementing my own sync and token server I really often I was catching myself "hey, you don't have to look into Python code, they really wrote how it should work in docs", especially [0] and [1] pages. There are also few other websites owned by Mozilla, which are very outdated, so also misleading.
Ah, worth noting is about:sync extension [2] and logs stored in the profile directory, which may help you to investigate some issues that might come during development and maintenance.
> Has anyone had any positive experiences with self-hosting the Firefox Sync Server?
I am biased a bit, because I had one very negative experience related to token verification error, which costed me ~4 dollars, before I noticed and I had put service into downtime for some months. However, I am really happy about a whole project. Operational costa are is about few cents per month. It also helped me to write some tools I use on daily basis and preserve knowledge I have learned about serverless applications on AWS.
[0]: https://mozilla-services.readthedocs.io/en/latest/storage/ap...
[1]: https://mozilla.github.io/application-services/docs/sync/faq...
PaperWM[0] is an example of a tiled scrolling (window) manager based on GNOME SDK (Mutter) that runs in GNOME session.
I have born in 90s, but I lived in a block from that era and remember how chute for trash was a nice idea - in winter time I haven't had to leave building to empty the trash bin.
You made me curious: what does mean _this_ in your comment? What do you like in ChromiumOS and would like to see in Ubuntu? What is in Ubuntu that you would like to have replaced with a ChromiumOS-like alternative?
However, we still receive spam e-mails to our inboxes.
I hope not, because slow, meaningless animation makes me tired and something inside me wants escape that page. Also it affects scrolling, especially noticeable when I am scanning a text instead of reading - you might lose context (note how the presentation reacts on pressing "page-up" / "page-down"). Kindle and all e-reader hates animations[0][1] - any animations (they are just huge black holes for battery). IMHO any documentation SHOULD be able to printed out on paper and sorry - paper is not interactive.
However, I will warmly welcome some interaction in dedicated docs section but it would be great if it could be duplicated as a rich-text article.
[0]: Not saying about the reader mode in browsers (e.g. Firefox)
[1]: Please think also about people that are disabled or use VoiceOver/NarratorMode to be more productive / are just lazy to read text using their eyes :)
[0]: https://teklager.se/en/products/routers/
[1]: https://teklager.se/en/products/routers/tlsense-i5-4lan
Edit: I noticed those thanks to link on PCEngines site, which is quite also amazing, knowing a fact TekLager and PCEngines are direct competitors.
[0]: https://teklager.se/en/knowledge-base/apu2c0-ipfire-throughp...
[1]: https://teklager.se/en/knowledge-base/apu2-1-gigabit-through...
[0]: https://community.notepad-plus-plus.org/category/8/boycott-n...
Yes, sure - it's a mirror, but take a look at original source [0][1]. I haven't found much information about "build & run" either.
> it’s a traditional “./configure && make && make install” type project
Yes, it is but you are talking about "building" not "running", which is also important process in terms of development. Also, deduction (from source code) what kind of combination of commands might be is a no-go argument for many would-be contributors (I looking at few friends who fall in love in npm start), not saying it requires some experience in specific tooling (here, how to build C projects), which not everyone has.
This, especially in non-web repos (C/C++) is common mistake of READMEs and docs.
Let's take an example of XFCE-WM project [0]. The main README does not include any information how to compile it, nor provides any link to the documentation how to build this very specific code. If you will google it you might find following wiki page [1], which is general for all repositories. In the COMPOSITOR [2] file you might notice some information about flags that you can provide during building, and that's great such doc has been created, but except that document I couldn't find any information how "fresh contributor" would like to debug and test some change in code that he made in the cloned repository. Download and install some linux distro on virtual machine and then invest (1h+) to configure it accordingly to run it there? Use Xephyr (I guess "fresh contributor" has never heard about this tool)?
In my honest experience, the "how to build" step is probably included in many of repositories, but the "how-to-run" is usually lacking in READMEs and it is what I really would like to see in complex projects (e.g. desktop environment).
> Document your availability. If you have to step away from the project, put this at the top of the README, even if it's temporary. Don't drip-feed interaction - be either on or off.
One more thing related to docs and "how-to-build-&-run" thing. Let's say the project owner have some critical accident that made him unavailable to push progress of development forward for few months or longer. If there isn't any knowledge shared (docs, other contributors) then I guess the project will be stalled and possibly forgotten if there is no clear incentive to use alternative methods of repo maintenance (e.g. fork).
[0]: https://github.com/xfce-mirror/xfwm4
[1]: https://docs.xfce.org/xfce/building
[2]: https://github.com/xfce-mirror/xfwm4/blob/master/COMPOSITOR
[0]: https://watabou.itch.io/procgen-mansion
[1]: The demo on that site utilizes keyboard not fancy buttons as in Fantasy City Generator, I recommend to quickly read information about key bindings.
[0]: https://helpblog.blackberry.com/2014/02/how-to-use-picture-p...
Based on my user experience Fenix (Firefox Preview) supports Firefox Sync in terms of bookmarks. I believe history and other data is also synchronized, but I haven't had occasion to test it thoroughly. In my opinion claim that "Fenix won't support Firefox Sync" is a bit too far [0]. I noticed the login/password sync feature has not been implemented yet [1]. I suppose it will might materialize soon, because lack of it could be a huge mistake in terms of usability.
[0]: https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/fenix/issues?q=firefox+syn...
Oh snap, I haven't thought the AppStore is such saturated platform, where there is specific app to send an email to myself - why FastMail or Spark won't be enough to do that? Isn't just two/one less click optimization app?
> Although Riot has made significant progress in the past few months, there is still a long way to go before it becomes a suitable drop-in replacement for platforms such as WhatsApp or Discord.
The problem with adoption client based on Matrix protocol is clearly lack of the quality of clients and being so annoying for users. I think it also stands true for other protocols like IRC or XMPP. In my humble opinion, clients for all 3 are far behind Telegram or WhatsApp or even BBM.
Looking on commits in repos of various Riot clients, I am not sure if there is significant progress (yes, it's a bit unfair to said that, but comparing to let's say webpack repository, number of random contributions is quite low). For Android there are two versions - Riot and RiotX. RiotX is in early stage development (I'd say it's unusable), while the Riot just gets minor changes. iOS client is OK. Web and desktop client (based on electron) is not as simple as Slack to get start and running. I keep fingers crossed for Riot developers and spontaneous contributors to improve those clients - without good, simple to use clients there isn't any chance for Matrix to be adopted widely as WhatsApp or Telegram are.
Centralization is not really important factor for most of people during selection of communicator. IM is a tool and if it does not do its job properly, people will look for better alternatives. Just, please take a look how many sysadmins/devops switched to Slack from IRC. Please stop writing yet another article how centralization is bad - just help Vector.im, TheLounge.chat or other group to bring such IM client where most of people will be comfortable to use it.
// Actually, I really got used to 802.11a/b/g/ac naming (when those standarts had very distinct features), it really has rooted into my brain, so it's very hear from me speaking WiFi-5.
It's so fast, so consumers have enough time to spend additional 2 seconds to pronounce the whole "3x2", "Gen" or other marketing gibberish. Not saying about good connotations of SS abbreviation (as in superspeed logo) in Europe, especially in Poland. /s
Jokes asides, but what is a reason of using 3.1 name for USB-C connector? It is very, very different how it looks, how it can transfer power than early rentangle-shaped connectors of 3.0's. And now again, USB-IF serves now the same drama again with ambiguous name. I'm glad I am techie guy, but I believe 80% people will end with question what they really need to connect device with their laptops.
I wish we could completely drop "superspeed"/"gen 2" and use way simplified name. Such name should not follow the naming that WiFis has now, like WiFi 5 or WiFi 4, because even if we include identifier for people more interested in technical name (standard), like WiFi 5 (802.11ac), it still ends with situation you actually have portion of information, because 802.11ac operates on various powers and streams, i.e. WiFi 5 (802.11ac Wave2; 4 streams @ 1024-QAM), which is way different how it works than former example. However, I really like the quite recently introduced naming like: AC2600 or AC5300[0]. When I someone mentions "WiFi AC 2.6k", it tells me a lot more about given device for a techie person and consumer. Also, let's take a look like we query data from databases, the AC2600 could be an unique indexed column (even a primary key!), it falls below of group within defined standard, has various parameters etc. etc.
On the contrary to WiFi, USB type is easily identifable by parameters like possible power delivery, data transfer and connector type (shape, size). Why USB-IF can't introduce similar naming that are clear for everyone to recognize? USB standards are not the same as an iPhone, they do not need any fancy name to be better than previous generation.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11ac
// Actually, I really got used to 802.11a/b/g/ac naming when it , it has really rooted into my brain, so it's very hear from me speaking WiFi-5.
EPubs are perfect for long-lengthy documents, where you can bookmark position to given line of text (not page, so I'd say it's more precise to get back in which paragraph you've finished reading), everything is searchable/copyable/highlightable, formatted into single-column, usually justified, wrapped using hyphenation, easy to change font size, colors (i.e. day/night mode) and there isn't strict paper (canvas) size. Basically, it increases accessibility and focus.
While the PDF is just like a ZIP (I think those formats share the same popularity), that consist collection of numbered crisp, anti-aliased PNGs and SVGs, sometimes with an attached metadata. I often hear, there isn't any chance to PDF document look different on other device. However, PDF is just a subset of PostScript (hence the name) and has many versions (standardized as a public document, by ISO, by other parties or just paywalled)[1]. Fortunately, quite old PDF1.5 version has majority of features used by typical document creator, also fact that there aren't many competing implementations and they seem to be up-to-date with PDF2.0 convinced users and developers to use it. That's worth noting, PDF supports reflow [0], but it is far from perfect and I guess many bookworms will refrain from using it at all.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Portable_Docume...
[1]: https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/using/reading-pdfs-reflow-ac...
SumatraPDF is fine to read EPUBs on Windows (also supports PDF, MOBI, FB2, CHM, XPS, DjVu) - it's free, open-source software [0][1].
[0]: https://github.com/search?q=org%3Amozilla-services+google&ty...