physicallyIllfr

Tells us who are the beastiality hires

No its not I use llms just as much as the next guy and not even fable can keep a codebase organized on long running unspervised tasks.

I prefer to do these things myself and grow my competency.

This will make me more valuable in the future when everyone has lost the ability to do anything on their own.

Why would you do this though, surely these long running /goal tasks just like letting a wild animal out into your code base.

Does anyone care about code quality anymore?

I havent met a single honest person who doesn't admit that their use or LLMs degrades their ability to do the same things without them. You're being dishonest.

What was edgy about asking someone to read a Thomas Pynchon essay on the word Luddite? Id argue their weird comment about people who don't like AI being luddites is more annoying and discriminatory.

AI maxxers know they're doing harm to themselves by overusing llms. The way they react so defensively when you point it out to them lets you know its real. Everyone wants to pretending like they have superpowers and are evolving into "100x" engineers, but in reality they're devolving.

Regular businesses are not going to build their own slop software because of AI, this is delusional. People will be hired because they love to build. Only a small percentage of the world loves to build things.

The most passionate people with the best reputation will suceed, they will continue to be in the most demand and will be the most valuable, like a swiss watchmaker.

Sorry LLMs arent replacing anyone who's got strong skills and cultivates them. You're so wrong here. These more passionate builders will however replace the lazy people who offload all their skill and brain capability to llms, and they'll use AI to help them.

Being lazy and letting llms do everything for you is not a good strategy.

Okay. I prefer to read Thomas Pynchon's writing. Y

Thats a really bad website too btw, design and functionality. Maybe use your brain before you lose it.

For a 100x engineer with 40 yrs exp that you claim to have, you make some real basic high schooler projects lol.

LLMs should not touch these technologies. Keep your slop factories in webdev. We have missles, planes and pacemakers to make still. If you ever feel like using your brain again, theres plenty of work to be done that llms cannot touch.

Why would you brag abput this. Most places make perf products do not use llms to write all their code. This isnt rare. You people dont know much outside of webdev. There isnt a single defense outfit doing it lol.

Im assigning you some reading homework today (or have you totally offloaded your ability to read to LLMs too)?

https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/97/05/18/r...

And why are the people calling people Luddite some of the least intelligent people I meet, and seem to be complete sheep fighting some psychological war on behalf of their billionaire lords who own the machinery.

Not wanting to hand off all your labor to a machine does not make you a luddite, nor should it be acceptable to call people that because you dont know how to have a real conversation.

We've been able to make watches with machines for 50 years. Handmade Watchmakers, and their producuts are more valuable and in demand than any guy running a conveyer belt. They still make 20x more if not 50x. People look up to them.

You can make a choice not to become a button pusher and still do things by hand. You dont have to fry your brain. You're falling for a massive trap to strip you of your value.

Reminds me of how slot machine users swear the odds have changed on a machine.

also when someone says you just have to prompt it a certain way it reminds me of people who think they can get better results out of a slot machine by pressing buttons in a certain order

The providers of these models also design the UX similarly to slot machines (run it x amount of times for better results, multiplying your spend) this isnt a coincidence and they're playing into the gambler mentality, and probably hire UX designers that specialize in this.

If you have reusable components it should be quite easy for you to add it yourself. Its okay to code by hand, especially when doing frontend.

When comes to frontend work, the handmade UX designed by a professional will always outperform whats made by an llm.

Sure its 10x slower, but you'll get 20x more usere because it will obvious it was made with care (if done well, and you should learn to do it well). Its the same reason handmade clothing, watches and other luxery items speak to us more, sometimes its marketing but often times its the craft.

There's a reason why all the companies selling the idea that web dev is dead, like lovable, still hire designers with 50k retainers to do their landing pages.

Wasn't there a "standard" that phones in south kora had to make a shutter noise when you took a picture because they had such a huge problem with men doing up the skirt photos of strangers?

Not sure why you think social norms are positive. Negative amoral behaviors can become norms. I'd argue the west has tons of amoral behavior that is normalized.

Jevs marketing has a lot to do with claiming credit for this pardigm, when the devloper of Layla was actually the first to do it. Its quite annoying to see another member of the OpenAI mafia so clearly rip off someone elses IP.

What we should be talking about how Jev is actually closed source Layla.