1,874 karma · joined February 19, 2007
Now: Independent product creation for iOS, OS X, Web. Mischief.
phil@yearofcode.com http://twitter.com/yeahphil http://yearofcode.com http://philkast.com
I'm on Keybase: --- [ my public key: https://keybase.io/kast; my proof: https://keybase.io/kast/sigs/dEkqhDCfLTxHpUyO7TFI8Bzx9fBU5iuI-w0AIB4MnIc ] ---
http://books.google.com/books?id=-vp31fS0OvoC&lpg=PA4...
There's good and bad news on the figure 8 itself. The good news is that they're visually easy to check -- any screw up will make the knot look very different. The bad news is that they invert at relatively low loads. That's mitigated with a long tail.
However, I've never seen any evidence that those single fisherman's people tie in the tail actually do anything. The key is making sure the tail is long enough that the knot is still tied if it inverts.
That's crazy about the rockfall -- lucky you guys weren't standing underneath!
I think it's the exception that proves the rule though. Word when it happened was he'd been cleaning loose rock on rap, and was not only wearing a blown-out harness (with a replacement on order at the time) but also apparently had a haul bag full of rocks clipped off to himself.
So -- if you are one of the world's most prolific climbers, use gear you have already decided to retire, and have an unusually high working load, you can maybe get your gear to fail. But it's still incredibly rare.
But it looked like there were some more nickels out in the middle of an 8-lane freeway...
Gear failures of all kinds are extremely rare.
Edit: objective hazard is significant, too: rockfall, afternoon thunderstorms, etc.
I don't know if that's what Jeff intended or not, but a lot of readers are going to have a strong association with the phrase "the best minds of my generation."
In 1988 his discovery of buffer overflow first brought the Internet to the attention of the general public.
In particular, everyone in this community should read When Genius Failed as a cautionary tale. It had a big impact on my world view. Here's a case where the best and brightest formed an accurate, contrarian hypothesis and executed on it perfectly, but were then blinded by their own cleverness and succumbed to hubris (the partners were leveraging their personal wealth to increase their stakes in their fund) and lost it all.
Like, a streamlined way of installing an app and the ability to launch it with some URL the first time. Relatively easy, not a platform threat.
Your comments (and the others saying this should have been anonymous) are really saying that you think scottmagdalein should feel ashamed about this part of his life -- in his replies he's telling you that he doesn't. It's worth reflecting on why you feel that way.
Edit: More seriously, all four of those suggestions are very good, and I'd like to see them too. For #4, a deep link to the app's notification settings would be good enough, and probably more likely than getting a notification settings controller in UIKit.
That is the little goal, though -- the big goal at Square is clearly to take over all real-world payments. The cheap reader was a simple place to start. (Go check out a store that running off an iPad with Square to see what they want to become).
This doesn't deal with clustering, of course. It's a different UI solution.
Maybe it's an attitude thing?
Edit: wouldn't have written this if I'd seen FooBarWidget's more detailed remarks first.