45 karma · joined July 1, 2014
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/phadej; my proof: https://keybase.io/phadej/sigs/DUjYvM8gtUMbYo5mBxVsEGspq5jROox8dWQ4qm8l2r0 ]
I did make a too quick judgement there. It turns out you can't easily see how popularality of CoffeeScript has changed.
It is surprising to see CoffeeScript in this list as a language compiler
should be mainly a dev-dependency. You compile the CoffeeScript source to
JavaScript for distribution, so you don’t need coffee-script to be a
dependency. The packages that depend upon coffee-script include among others:
grunt, jasmine-node, jscoverage, cucumber and hubot. They all allow you to use
CoffeeScript sources.
While there isn't anything wrong in supporting CoffeeScript out-of-the-box, I like karma's approach more. It has "karma-coffee-preprocessor", it should be self-explanatory.Though there are now much more users, there are still less than of nodeunit or mocha.
A bit longer one:
One can fetch `jsverify` package metadata from http://registry.npmjs.org/jsverify and all current packages are listed in http://registry.npmjs.org/-/all (this one is special, its size is around 50MiB). Please cache your results, let's not DDoS the registry.
There are around one gigabyte of nice JSON data. After initial fetch you can traverse it using any tools you want. I naturally used node.js for that too.
One could fetch the actual packages too (e.g. the smaller ~20k package set). But there should be more motivators than just counting the amount lines of code :)