peter422

Why not get your content from ad-free platforms?

The biggest players are running highly, highly efficient software.

It may pay off in the long term but most homeowners don't think in a 50 year time horizon.

It's possible that the machines were advanced at some things but something that human bodies produced was something they couldn't directly synthesize.

Autonomous cars can be far from perfect and still safer than human drivers, who all consistently overestimate how safe they are.

Not to mention it’s in the vertical of blogging which has been around for 20 years, in which your offering is very similar to every other alternative, and there are many well known free alternatives.

If you have the technical skill to make a service this complicated, make something that people value more than $2 a month, and make something that hasn’t been made 100 times before. Execution is more important than idea only if the idea isn’t terrible.

If I were you I would stop on this idea immediately and come up with somewhere where the average user would expect to pay $50-$1000 per month for the service. I don’t think this is a good vertical to get into. Your competition are both better than you at the bottom of the market (free alternatives) and the top of the market and there is very little left for you. And even if you do get tens or hundreds of users, it will be just as unsustainable and you’ll also have the guilt when you decide to shut it down and kick all your users off.

Yet not only is Twitter not growing but it’s shrinking.

I think your expectations for success in this vertical are off.

However at the end of the day stability only gets you so far, since we are always moving, so it really makes sense to combine isometric exercises with other ones to get a robust exercise plan for whatever goals each person has.

Here is recent, high quality one, but there are many more (and some with conflicting results - but to my eye the best studies all point to similar conclusions).

The decrease in serious illness is due to prior immunity and vaccination.

Though it’s obviously a hard thing to prove either way. But certainly I do not think it should be assumed that omicron is inherently more mild.

We should be doing both!

Anyways, all things being equal, I’d prefer more relevant ads.

Then I talked with other people in the startup world who said it was a perfect match.

That's when I realized that I just worked at competent places.

Regardless of how selective they are with admissions it also doesn't mean that a large chunk of the people they rejected wouldn't have also done fine there.

Arguably it's much easier to get good grades at Harvard due to grade inflation if you are a good student (which you are by definition if you are at the top of your class) than at state schools.

If you truly think that the top 2.5% of black students would be "out of place" at Harvard then you have a completely invented mysticism of what it means to go to Harvard.

Don't throw out numbers like that unless you are willing to back them up, because your claim seems completely insane.

If they aren't crawling or indexing your site, then link to it from a high reputation place.

Almost no data backs that up.

The aggregate stats are the most important things to look at, especially for something like AEB which has the ability to save pedestrians, which as of late are getting mowed down more and more frequently.

There are a lot of well intentioned people doing things that directly or indirectly harm people. We generally grade people on intentions and not results.

Other countries have different strategies and those also come with trade offs.