283 karma · joined September 21, 2017
The post's title is click bait.
The culture of places are not so well defined in America. It is a new nation of immigrants. Europeans may have lived in the same towns for hundreds or thousands of years. American is less than 250 years old.
Americans identify as individuals. An individual is identified by personal accomplishments or work. Alternatively, a group identity might define a person by location or family name. The root question "who are you?" is asked depending on what approach you take. Identity is a subjective social construct; neither approach is more right than the other.
Suppose property owners have been benefiting from the tax shelters for 10 years. That was the payoff. Don't dally around asking what their next hand out should be. They've been riding the gravy train for years. Now the perks need to end. Welcome to a level playing field.
This mostly shift the tax burden to new home buyers and renters.
You get odd effects like in 2009, when property values dramatically fell due to the market bubble bursting, taxes actually went up because the assessed values were so much lower then the just market value.
In 2016, a 6.9 million dollar house was only taxed at 2.8 million. Source https://www.jacksonville.com/photogallery/LK/20170125/PHOTOG...
Not everyone has the freedom to instantly change jobs. The world might be a better place if employees had the right to whistle blow without being threatened with homelessness or fleeing to Russia.
Unions striking and protesting against their companies for better wages seems acceptable. Why is protesting for ethical reasons without quitting faux pas?
We should be free to dismiss magic as imaginative whimsy without hard science. "Not uh" is a valid counter argument.
gifted =/= smart
My major was a lucky whim.
Average patrons might be willing to donate $100 a year if they understood they were allowing art or research to exist instead of just paying for market-rate viewership. This type of donation would allow 1,000 dedicated followers to support a niche cause instead of the lowest common denominator stuff creators like Pewdiepie has to put out to amass millions of fans.
Tesla buys batteries from Panasonic. Why would Tesla have excess supply?
A lifetime supply of insulin is much more expensive than setting a broken bone. We are not all equally likely to have cancer or respiratory disease.
The 10 minute difference is the waste. The 15 minutes is some acceptable transit time you agree we must have. This discussion is centered around the waste.
Claiming there is some essential traffic time is a straw man argument
The traditional form of healthy is avoiding harm; avoiding less than normal health. Ice baths and fasting seem like an attempt to be above the baseline normal healthy. Its an addition instead of avoiding a subtraction.
This singular problem point was completely ignored by the rest of the article and in the proposed solutions.
It seems like no matter what drug companies charge, our government MUST pay it. And citizens not covered by the government MUST buy health insurance. The ACA says it is illegal for you not to buy coverage; if you don't there is a fine. If you to not pay this fine (individual responsibility tax), you go to jail.
The case of Nelene Fox shows that HMOs MUST pay for anything, even unreasonable procedures for terminally ill patients.
How can the market function when you MUST PAY?
Some child just learning the colors gets a free pass, but if you put up a website to explain something and its wrong, I think its reasonable to "aggressively" say so.
The article deceptively passes off purple for violet, and shows magenta for contrast. It is wrong.
Ads will exist until people are empowered to block them.
Wouldn't it make more sense to socialize the healthcare industry itself? Our tax dollars pay for much of the education and hospitals. Are we entitled to ownership?
The concept of "tiny house" romanticizes a small budget. Poorer people get smaller houses.