Are you open to contributing to this RFC?
87 karma · joined October 23, 2013
Are you open to contributing to this RFC?
This seems awkwardly unnecessary for a technology that has only prioritized deflationary economics and economic sovereignty through private key encryption.
We recall consumer products for danger well below the numbers reported in the article above. A vehicle on the road should be held to an even higher standard.
You can walk into NIPS and find a handful of other researchers that perform at or better in this space.
edit: Looks like they were public gems, but in general it's always good advice to consult a lawyer before disrupting commercial or public systems.
see Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209.
essentially, all you have to do is prove that there is "dangerous probability" that a monopolist can recoup their losses after all competitors have been priced out.
An artist does not get paid after the first payment from the label from the sale of a CD. If you play the CD on repeat, the artist does not benefit, nor does the label.
/Labels/ get paid for every single listen on Spotify.
There is also Spotify Direct, too, and the artist can directly benefit more than if they went with a label.
But.. people did change jobs? Unemployment is at an all-time low and goods and services are very cheap. Housing is not cheap, but that's a function of the wage rate (which could be argued is a function of housing costs).
Just because there are more services industry jobs and less manufacturing does not mean that 'blue collar America' is forgotten -- it's just changed identities.
Everyone benefits from global trade because the terms of trade should always benefit both parties.
http://h1bdata.info/index.php?em=APPLE+INC&job=&city=&year=2...
for extremely competitive, highly sought-after employers. I guarantee you if you go to Texas, that salary $ is not that high on the mean at all.
hypergains = hyperpains