pera

Based on those rules your guess would be wrong :)

This is not about age really: "NFTs"/"web3.0"/"Blockchain technologies" for instance were hyped by every age group.

From the same dilettantes who brought you the Zizians and other bizarre cults... thanks but I rather read Nostradamus

That might explain this then:

> Trump Tariffs Hit Antarctic Islands Inhabited by Zero Humans and Many Penguins

https://www.wired.com/story/trump-tariffs-antarctic-islands-...

> we also sought a language that would allow us to model check (and later prove) key aspects of systems designs while being more approachable to programmers.

I find it a bit surprising that TLA+ with PlusCal can be challenging to learn for your average software engineer, could anyone with experience in P show an example of something that can be difficult to express in TLA+ which is significantly easier in P?

It's not about the style and it's a mistake to perceive generative AI models as analogues of human artists:

- When does generative AI qualify for fair use?:

https://suchir.net/fair_use.html

- AI is currently just glorified compression:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38399753

Call centres are the first target for full automation. If I remember correctly they represent 3 million jobs in the US only.

There are no "safe jobs" in capitalism.

You can do interesting things with executable binaries as well, see WINE :)

Open model is such a misnomer: it's like calling an ELF an "open executable".

Distributing things for free doesn't make them "open". The reality is that free (as in free beer) weights are closer to freeware than anything open source. In fact, since all these models are build using pirated media a more appropriate term could be plain old warez.

Do you really need to provide the docs? I would have imagined that those docs are included in their training sets. There is even a guide on how to migrate from GTK3 to GTK4, so this seems to be a low-hanging fruit job for an LLM iff they are okay for coding.

Yeah sorry I worded my comment in a weird way: I'm definitively not advocating for any of those points

I guess the majority in here would agree that without strong market intervention OpenAI will soon implode. They urgently need:

- WIPO copyright exemption

- Anti-China protectionist measures

- Hard-line hardware export control

- Multi-billion dollar government contracts

You are missing GP's point and misunderstanding what generative models are actually doing.

The late OpenAI researcher and whistleblower, Suchir Balaji, wrote an excellent article regarding this topic:

https://suchir.net/fair_use.html

The Intercept wrote an article about ShadowDragon and SocialNet a few years ago:

https://theintercept.com/2021/09/21/surveillance-social-medi...

The explosion of garbage content is a big issue and has radically changed the way I use the web over the past year: Google and DuckDuckGo are not my primary tools anymore, instead I am now using specialized search engines more and more, for example, if I am looking for something I believe can be found in someone's personal blog I just use Marginalia or Mojeek, if I am searching for software issues I use GitHub's search, general info straight to Wikipedia, tech reviews HN's Algolia etc.

It might sound a bit cumbersome but it's actually super easy if you assign search keywords in your browser: for instance if I am looking for something on GitHub I just open a new tab on Firefox and type "gh tokio".

classic SLA hacking

Your example sounds reasonable but it's not realistic: The actual use of this type of tools is to intimidate those workers who have outputted 9.8 items instead of the average 9.9 over the past week.

This is how our society ended up making Amazon delivery workers urinating in fucking bottles inside their trucks.

Years ago I wrote one in ~50 lines of C using a wordlist of short, simple english, words:

https://gitlab.com/trobador/sdice

"Never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by corruption" - Argentinian saying

I still don't understand the meaning of "woke", for example here is one of the grants that are in Ted Cruz database:

https://www.usaspending.gov/award/ASST_NON_2414922_4900/

> STABLE HOMOTOPY THEORY IN ALGEBRA, TOPOLOGY, AND GEOMETRY -STABLE HOMOTOPY THEORY WAS DEVELOPED [...]

> TO ADDRESS INEQUALITY AT THE K-12 LEVEL, THE PI WILL DEVELOP AND MANAGE A PROGRAM PAIRING UNDERGRADUATES FROM HIS HOME INSTITUTION WITH STUDENTS FROM LOCAL AFTER-SCHOOL PROGRAMS FOR ONLINE TUTORING. THIS PROGRAM WOULD CIRCUMVENT CERTAIN BARRIERS TO PARTICIPATION, SUCH AS LACK OF ACCESS TO TRANSPORTATION AND FACILITIES, WHICH ARE COMMON IN TRADITIONAL OUTREACH

Is this really deemed as "neo-Marxist" "far-left" "nonsense" by Trumpists? Is this the same "wokeness" that Paul Graham was referring to in his latest essay?

Yup I have emailed dang a few times regarding wrongly flagged submissions and he has always unflagged them.

> “They apparently just sort of walked past security and said: ‘Get out of my way,’ and they’re looking for access for the IT systems, as they have in other agencies,”

Are they looking to erase climate data to dismiss climate change? It seems so pointless now, like who are they trying to fool?

Verso: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41215727

Note that GP said "since GPT 3" but the parent responded with "ChatGPT". My response was to clarify the timeframe that has elapsed since GPT-3.

Psychological denial of what exactly? And what part of the article/preprints you are commenting on?

Every time an article exposing some limitation of the current wave of LLMs is submitted to HN there are comments like yours and I genuinely cannot understand the point you are trying to make: There is no such thing as a perfect technology, everything has limitations, and we can only improve our current state of the art by studying these and iterate.

OpenAI API for GPT-3 was launched on June 11, 2020, that's four years and seven months ago:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23489653

Bizarre argument considering that the only people who did not "trust science" (and the CDC in particular) during the previous Trump administration were Trumpists themselves.

I can't even SSO into one of our orgs because of 500s/timeouts

Does anyone know if there is anything like Nepenthes but that implements data poisoning attacks like https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02946