Did they die from COVID-19 or did they with COVID-19?
Italy just revised their numbers and it’s quite a significant difference.
19 karma · joined July 14, 2021
Did they die from COVID-19 or did they with COVID-19?
Italy just revised their numbers and it’s quite a significant difference.
I’m sure that’s how it was intended to work but the term you’re looking for is artificial immunity or vaccine derived immunity. Unfortunately the vaccines don’t confer immunity so there goes that.
>What happens when we reach a critical mass of health workers quitting?
For not consenting to a vaccination mandate? We’re all about to find out. Can you imagine working on the front lines for over a year to suddenly be discarded like a piece of trash because you won’t take a vaccine (when you are almost certainly already immune)?
>The transmission argument similarly falls short given that the vaccine reduces the odds of you becoming a vector in the first place, or progressing to the point you require state intervention to survive
Speaking of disingenuous... I’m not sure why people gloss over the fact that the vaccines don’t prevent transmission. Why fumble over word games instead of acknowledging the simple fact that you don’t get immunity from the vaccine.
Now follow that train of thought to it’s logical end. Universal forced vaccination of everyone on Earth with passports to boot and the outbreaks still continue.
Well hey at least we have this neato “world ID” (vaccine passport) which couldn’t possibly be used for nefarious means.
Please post some proof to corroborate any of this. I assume you’re talking about COVID strains here?
>Natural immunity isn’t going to happen, we have seen far too many cases of reinfection with different variants.
Again, source desperately needed here. I’m more than willing to change my take but only with hard data, not sweeping generalizations based on a misunderstanding of how natural immunity works.
Anyway, I’m rambling. In a nutshell, they shouldn’t be thought of as the same technology because well, they’re not.
- Full liability for vaccine manufacturers
- No censorship of dissenting views
- Open discussion with all views represented instead of suppressed
- Honesty on unvaccinated vs vaccinated case, death numbers
- Following the science instead of what’s convenient for politicians at the moment
Why? So that vaccination status won’t be private health data anymore, it will slowly work it’s way towards being public information.
With the data public, non-compliers can be harassed, threatened or worse without governments having to lift a finger to oppress them.
I mean, those dang morons not getting the available vaccine which does nothing for transmission of the current viral variant! Eesh, well that doesn’t hold water either...
Ugh this is too complicated, let’s just blame the unvaccinated anyways mmkay?
Vaccinated people are just as likely to spread the delta variant. If you disagree, please post your proof. Until then, please stop spreading misinformation.
You’re attempting to tie these mutations to only the unvaccinated. They likely shed mutations as well but that’s not what this paper highlights.
Not only can the vaccinated spread the virus but they’re likely making it more pathogenic in the process. See here:
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/info:doi/10.13...
We recommend that: 1) universal vaccination should be administered as soon as possible to suppress the generation of virulent mutations;
Wait, I’m being punked.. right?
How is universal vaccination the solution, if it is literally the cause of the more contagious strain?
The logic is a bit circular, no?
Also Roundup doesn’t particularly work that well anymore. Ask anyone who uses Roundup in a commercial setting about it.
Search pubmed for glyphosate for a small taste. Then realize that most of those studies were done ONLY on glyphosate, the solvents and surfactants that glyphosate is mixed with to make Roundup are excluded. Post some studies if you find any juicy ones!
Unfortunately Monsanto will just wheel out their next toxic poison right after Roundup is banned completely.
Back to your last point. If you don’t want germs, I’m not sure an office environment is for you. A 100% vaccinated office will still be susceptible to spreading COVID, especially if the Delta variant takes off like it did in the UK and Israel.
>Unvaccinated people have made a choice to risk their lives, they don’t get the choice to risk mine.
Doesn’t the vaccine cover for this? You get the vaccine and it reduces your symptoms, making you less likely to end up hospitalized or die. Even vaccinated you can still get infected, get sick from and spread the virus.
https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/896/censorship
I think the need to redefine words like censorship is to make one seem good and necessary and one seem bad and deplorable. So “deplatforming” is now the good censorship and censorship remains the bad. Again see the link to clarify what exactly constitutes censorship. It doesn’t matter if you get it or not.
>Have a miracle cure for COVID?
Nope, just a suppressed treatment which could save lives. If the medical establishment actually cared about health it would be bending over backwards to study it instead of actively suppressing it. All I can do is post the science, here are 60 studies with more than half peer reviewed:
Calling medical doctors and researchers who risk their careers to publish studies backing up potential treatments are not charlatans, they’re heroes.
Using a recent example: YouTube removes a video of medical Doctors promoting studies of a COVID treatment, one that could save lives. There’s science to back it up, however it’s not science promoted by the medical majority. Thus, it is censored. As a result, people don’t have access to a potentially life saving treatment and will die - this is censorship.
Are there worse examples of this concept happening over the past century? Yes, of course. But censorship leading to the deaths of millions is certainly bad.
https://mobile.twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/14157273544632...
Sorry, thought stuff like this was more well known. They’ve been colluding for quite a while but now it’s so brazenly open the White House press secretary is mentioning it in press conferences.
offers you red pill
Here’s a good starter article: https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/07/op...