206 karma · joined April 16, 2019
We're making satellites that rapidly track wind over the entire ocean. NASA's head of oceanography said everyone will want to buy our data.
Weather satellites are disjointed. We iterate on our satellites weekly at 1/1000th the cost. We're aiming to develop the world's first cohesive weather information system.
They have resources for anyone wanting to learn more.
The SEO is pretty strong with "typing test" so that may be my problem.
To your specific questions, I've had some similar experiences and find that it's helpful to think in smaller terms. Find small things that interest you and explore them without threat or promise or waiting. Also follow the RAIN framework with feelings of envy: recognize, accept, investigate, nurture.
Sometimes I plan to walk somewhere a few hours away. That way I have to keep going.
Space elevators aren't scrapped, just on the shelf until we even have a material that let's us think they might be feasible. That said, Lunar space elevators could be done with lower-strength materials, like Kevlar, and there are some people working on them.
For Earth orbit, I think the centrifuge concept (e.g. SpinLaunch) has some promise. Still some huge implementation hurdles, but could be a huge step forward to put all of the energy for the first stage on the ground.
Generally, it seems strange to think some aspect of nature has to be valuable.
I don't see any details in the readme. It's kind of hard to evaluate what you've built without them. Care to flush it out or describe more here?
Lessons From a Failed Startup is doing a good job helping people talk about this more: https://open.spotify.com/show/7IE4r9wIpCYbwvwAOcltq4?si=Txqa...
https://www.reddit.com/r/Starlink/comments/gxypym/starlink_h...