passerby1

Would someone suggest how would hundreds of investigations (and courts? Or there were no courts at all?) were not able to shed any light on the bug? How is it even possible to continue for more than 20 years?

How many apps do use certificate pinning and so will be broken as a result of this app's MITM?

But it's democratic [0], specifically a direct one: "tradition of direct democracy".

0 - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Switzerland

It reads as "survived users".

Does anyone know how to turn it off forever?

Need to mention the punishments and fines in Germany for making noise. Switzerland has even more strict rules (and very angry neighbours, I assume).

> but just any law enforcement would find such an amount of cash suspicious, and probably trigger an investigation

It feels like it's almost illegal to own cash when I read this. Would someone please tell why? It's OK to live in a debt, probably a very high one, buying expensive things like luxury car in credit. Is it forbidden to save cash? If it's OK, then why is it suspicious to travel in a car with cash?

> Privatize the profits, socialize the costs (like toxic cleanup).

Any business would love to do the same, if possible. Because that's the businesss: increase the profits.

Should it then be considered a "natural" way? And where should we draw a line (if any) on what's ok?

Why only now?

Does it makes sense to push for representatives to discuss a law to forbid a city or state announcements to use any commercial platform for announcements?

Both comments are false. Reality is more complex as _sometimes_ it ignores: [0]

0: https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/have-you-seen/2022/04/2...

What's the difference between those two?

> The promise of Bitcoin is to bring a monetary system politicians and bankers cannot manipulate. Whether that’s a good thing or even realistic is a separate discussion.

Never heard of any politician giving up power voluntarely.

And money is the power: no more printing - need to work hard for money.

Not gonna happen.

Google loves to provide support, but for its customers only. Customer is a one who pays them millions of dollars for ads.

Using adblock is indeed very convenient. Enable browser extension and forget about all web annoyances. Calm and peece.

Google Ad Premium disables google ads only (or most of them?), while other ad nets (avg more than 80 cookies on every major news site!) will continue to annoy.

> will happily gouge for rent

Making profit is the goal for renting out, right?

Could you give some examples of coups for resources other that oil?

Bouncing usually requires money

First of all is to come to some kind of an agreement on the definition of ethical.

Following the logics of requiring an official government-issued docs, is it required for any fact written in Wikipedia, or where they draw the line?

In other words, how exactly is the "common knowledge" separated from the "controversal" one, which requires a proof to present to self-appointed guardians of the True?

What are PMs' arguments for the switch?

Interesting. Which of his books do you refer here to?

Do anyone seriously consider changing Jira/confluence to some alternative after this?

I personally stopped using Jira a couple of years ago in projects I lead.

Good for you! But the question was about it being secure, while answer is about something else.

Looks like a valid for a non-canadian, why is this downvoted?

It would be good to see titles for links above. What's your point of listing them without titles?

`Destroying apple, please wait... General error detected: the destroyer is destroyed.` /s

Yes. By the way, the parent comment highlights an important point of having lots of countries and jurisdictions which has very different view on this. My prediction is that it will be fragmented.

Where should the profit come from for a search-oriented product/business?

Wow. Never happens in Europe. Or in the US. /s