150 karma · joined September 8, 2013
A question: What's the best way to keep ourselves accountable to the tasks of "talking to users", "do things that don't scale" and "writing code" every week?
We write a weekly report, and set milestones to go for each week - but it doesn't feel like these things focus us our attention as well as they could be.
Most of the time people don't want to post this on LinkedIn as its too public of a space to go about bragging of your achievements at employer X. With this system, Google basically has a window into this more specific information.
Given this, "Hire" is (or could become) a trojan horse into replacing the network effect that LinkedIn has created.
Given this, "Hire" is (or could become) a trojan horse into replacing the network effect that LinkedIn has created.
Khan Academy (https://www.khanacademy.org/) has great resources for all levels of maths up until the first year of university - easily the friendliest and most comprehensive set of classes and topics for maths until that level
MIT Open Courseware (http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/find-by-topic/#cat=mathematics) has many courses that you can pick from and start to learn from. For these it doesn't hurt to see what textbooks they're using (if any) and purchasing them and going through the problem sets yourself.
The great thing about maths, is that until you get to the very high levels, many problems can be checked against pre-made answers.
Hope this helps!
I would argue though, that many of these successful companies are more platform providers than SASS.
- Somehow be a good brother, son and boyfriend while I work excessive hours
- Develop an exceptional enterprise app
Because of this, consulting exists somewhat differently to startups as well. In the startup world, your aim is to delight the customer. If you apply that same principle, you'll be tempted to say things that make people happy. I'd argue proper consultant or advisor in any field (whether IT consulting or management consulting) must be able to make a judgement concerning their expertise or their analysis regardless of what 'wants' to be heard by their prospective client (in lieu of how much they might be paying them).
This isn't to say the article posted is of no use. Having a 'graph-like' mental model of how things work is incredibly useful, as most education simplifies real-world problems into a few key issues. Although most non-computer science issues can be reduced successfully using the 80/20 rule in real life, sometimes some problems require us to look at the 100s of contributing factors to allow us to solve the problem we're facing properly.
The more 'graph-like' problem solving becomes acceptable as way to solve issues the better of everyone will be.
If there were three things you would do differently, what would they be?