I'm not 100% sure if this is current, but APT uses (or used) a heuristics search, but it is possible to configure it to use an external solver instead. See https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/blob/main/doc/extern...
1,797 karma · joined February 19, 2009
I'm not 100% sure if this is current, but APT uses (or used) a heuristics search, but it is possible to configure it to use an external solver instead. See https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/blob/main/doc/extern...
Image of a typical North American school bus: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_bus_traffic_stop_laws...
If you plug a headset into a VirtualLink adapter it will go into the "cinematic mode" and function as a floating 1080p monitor with 3dof tracking done by the headset.
https://twitter.com/Thrilluwu/status/1635374573368778752?s=2...
They also get another $1B of deposits from people loading money onto their app to pay for drinks. Starbucks is basically sitting on the equivalent of a small banks deposits at any given time.
It seems the primary complaint is that Google is having one-on-one meetings and not allowing employees to have a union representative with them, or any support person at all unless they have a doctors note.
There's other complaints as well around how the company is handling reimbursement of legal expenses for laid off employees who want to get legal advice before signing the settlement agreement.
It's a bit confused by the first function. It takes two arguments, x and y, and returns a tuple. The first value is 'y' and the second value is (sin(pi % 100 * y) * -18) * perlinNoise(frameNumber % 20, 0.3 * x, ), 0.1 * y). I might be a little off on that formula, it's been awhile since I've read k code.
> The court held that Rural's directory was nothing more than an alphabetic list of all subscribers to its service, which it was required to compile under law, and that no creative expression was involved. That Rural spent considerable time and money collecting the data was irrelevant to copyright law, and Rural's copyright claim was dismissed.
In theory a curated phone book could be copyrighted, e.g. a hypothetical "Best Restaurants in San Francisco" compilation could be copyrighted. However a general phonebook just listing business in alphabetical order does not meet the originality threshold that was laid out in Feist v. Rural.
You can copyright creative expressions that use math formulas, but only that expression itself would be covered. E.g. a paper presenting a proof of a theorem would be copyrightable, but all of the facts expressed by the formulas would not be copyrightable.
Meta might've lost trade secret protection here, as they shared the weights with pretty much anyone with an .edu email address. A court might rule that they didn't take enough steps to keep the model weights secret.
For example, this Best Western logo (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Best_Western_logo.sv...) was rejected by the copyright office.
An argument might be made that the curation of data that goes into the training set qualifies, but it might depend on how much expressiveness and originality went into the curation.
For example, I could see a court ruling that the weights for a model trained on "all the good music from the 70s" is copyrightable, as someone had to express what they believed was "good" music, but a model trained on a large percentage of the internet without much curation would not.
Of course, nobody really knows until the courts weigh-in on it.
The catch with JS is that variable scoping rules are different when you use 'var', if you use 'let' and 'const' the scoping rules work like most programmers would expect for block statements.
You mention Hulu which I think is a great example of that model failing. Hulu was originally a intended to be that kind of platform, and has at times included investment from ABC, NBC, FOX, and Time Warner. Now Disney owns a majority share in it and it's a brand under Disney's streaming services, and I think would like to just fold it into Disney+, but they'd need to make some sort of deal with Comcast for their minority share.
It's likely they went with KitFox because they already had a relationship. One of the founders of KitFox is Tanya Short, who's edited two books on procedural game design with the DF programmer, Tarn Adams.
Yeah, he wrote about why here: https://popehat.substack.com/p/goodbye-twitter
He's on Mastodon (https://mastodon.social/@Popehat) and coincidentally re-tweeted (or whatever the Mastodon equivalent is) the author of this piece a couple days ago talking about this topic.
I've not looked at a map to see how much area that covers, but it sounds like foreign buyers could still purchase rural properties.
https://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/media-newsroom/notices/2022/e...
I was curious, and it looks like it had a Blu-ray release, but it was a limited production run. I guess they decided to constrain supply in order to get a high price.
https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Blue-Max-Blu-ray/87746/#O...