1,093 karma · joined August 30, 2013
This requires however to remember the name of the command (or parts of it). I often remember that but not where to find it or the shortcut.
It also requires that you chose the spacebar search option, which is the only correct option if you ask me. (Not a pro. Just messing around with blender sometimes.)
- I don't want to make myself dependant on a company from a foreign nation if I can help it.
- I want to keep the ability to use my own brain, especially given that they still are massively undercharging. So once they would start to charge the real price and my brain is gone I would have no choice and it would ruin me (I don't make that much money).
- I am very suspicious about the legal situation. How is it legal to generate software based on other software while not adhering to any license agreement? Don't say "fair use", the American government made sure that doesn't exist outside of the USA.
- I'm not your grandma.
And for outside of programming where you can't easily recognize when something is hallucinated accuracy is a huge issue. When I use Google its AI answers are often complete nonsense. I usually ignore them. Only sometimes notice the nonsense.
If you speak German it's very interesting. Sounds like we should build more geothermal power plants.
And then there are digital signatures. 5 years ago I looked into automatically verifying signed documents. Either there are multiple competing standards on how to sign a PDF or my government (Austria) just invented their own for the heck of it. Could not figure out to verify those signatures. Our government provides a website where you can upload such a PDF so they verify it for you. Yeah, sure. Nice try. The source of the website is open, but it is the kind of abstracted factory heavy Java where I couldn't figure out where it all happens. It doesn't happen in one place, but multiple abstract places and at some point I just gave up trying to reverse engineer how it is done. The signatures I calculated never matched.
It's more difficult now than it was back then for KDE I guess, because with Qt Widgets, QML, and Plasma you basically have three times as much to support in a theme/theming engine. And then back in the day better KDE themes also provided themes for Gtk, so that Gtk apps integrated nicely. How many concurrent Gtk versions are now used that you would all have to support? And sometimes (especially non-Qt programs) take some colors from the theme, but not others, breaking everything when you want to customize your theme (you get e.g. black text on black background). So I appreciate the renewed effort, but I'm not holding my breath.
Maybe make the graphic aria-hidden and add an empty tag with aria-description (or other kind of tag only screen readers see) describing the current graphic to each slide.
• Don't hijack any browser functionality. Scrolling shall scroll the document, the end.
• Don't scale something to the screen size, breaking zoom! Especially don't do it so that when zooming causes a different scroll position and then it all jumps to a different slide. WTF!
• Make it accessible!
If you want to make flashy graphics and animations make a game. That is not meant as to belittle games, I love games.
I heared zed sandboxes extensions. I should have a look at that editor some day.