If you really want to go that way, it would be a good idea to also get rid of the -mas ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_(liturgy) )
115 karma · joined December 10, 2014
If you really want to go that way, it would be a good idea to also get rid of the -mas ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_(liturgy) )
But you might not find it that exciting then, having teenage kids has its own drawbacks.
These two facts make things a little worse imo.
Now that one is probably deserving a Darwin Award...
It's not a war, it's not a contest. There are no "sides" and there's nothing to "win".
It's just adapt or die.
And there are many ways to adapt, it can mean changing ourselves just as it can mean changing our environment.
Well, I've seen more people become dependent with hash/pot than with alcohol. I'd say that's because it's much harder to be functional drunk than stoned.
There might not be physical cravings or withdrawal but when someone starts hitting the bong several times a day, all this talk about hard and soft drugs is bullshit. And once they want to stop, the biggest difference is that they don't have the excuse of being in pain physically.
Heroin was first marketed by Bayer, a German pharmaceutical company in 1898. That's where the name 'heroin' comes from so oxycodone was definitely not pre- in Germany.
Now, in nazi Germany, opium and products derived from it might have been harder to come by because of import sanctions (that's why methadone, a fully synthetic opioid, was developed in Germany in 1937). But that would apply to oxycodone just as much as heroin.
So no, the author is just full of shit and trying to impress his uninformed readers.
Nothing strange at all, congrats!
The "labs lobbying" comment was kind of tongue-in-cheek: making fun of the "crazies" being paranoid about "crazy feminists"...
The real reason's probably more about bioethics: no dna profiling of people who don't consent without a court order (and children being too young to consent, you need a court order for a paternity test).
Oh, you know, these days in the West, the big unions are more partners with the governments/employers than they are on the side of the workers.
Many unions have become tools that exists only to perpetuate their own existence, instead of being tools for workers to organize and collectively defend their interests against those of their employers and governments.
It doesn't change anything. The content is still available for anyone to see if they want to.
Censorship is about making content unavailable. Not giving the exact same visibility to everything out there isn't censorship. Or upvoting is also a form of censorship, since it moves content above less-upvoted comments making less-upvoted comments more likely to be missed by people who won't scroll to the end of the page.
And for anyone used to HN's way of doing things, it's not hard to spot faded comments and highlight them if they seem of interest given the context around them.
The commit history of this project remains available too... however, they forbid the authors to use the word in the live version if they want their project to be hosted on github. Now, I guess it's their prerogative to set the rules for people using their service. But I think it's also fair to say that being the facebook of programming it feels like they're kind of bullying the authors into compliance...
I'm pretty sure it's a really a non-story. Someone at github overreacted when a complaint was received. Big deal. If they started blocking accounts for reasons like this on a regular basis, many people would move somewhere else. It's not like they don't have competitors with equally good solutions. Their only advantage is their large userbase.
Now, for slashdot, the slashdot crowd definitely has some responsibility. Still, they did pretty much anything they could to antagonize them (although, I'm not sure what they could have done not to, it seems like it's a pretty important part of being a slashdotter to hate on the staff).
Funny... that's when they took down Freedom Hosting right? If I recall correctly, they didn't use a 0-day, they targeted a vulnerability that had been patched in the regular tor browser so only people using an outdated version of the browser were hit by it.
Plus, calling Freedom Hosting a "child pornography ring" isn't representing accurately what it was. Sure, their was child porn hosted there. Maybe even most of what was hosted there was child porn, I don't know... but that was a web host. There was no encouragements from Freedom Hosting to host cp there (apart from not doing anything to prevent it).
Plus, apart from busting the guy responsible for FH, I'm not sure they got anyone of interest with this operation... at least, I haven't heard of it and I'm sure they wouldn't have been too shy to brag about it if they had made any high-profile cp bust from this.
I'm pretty sure some people expect to do just that, especially in the gaming community. Although, I'm not sure it's going to be worse than spending 24h+ gaming on a regular screen while heavily imbibing energy drinks...
That's pretty much what's going on for professional athletes... now, I wouldn't like being forced to take some drugs to be able to make a living. And if we say it's ok to do it for professional sports, how long until someone says it should be ok in other fields?
Still the context is important. When talking about some machine, it's obvious that it's meant for robot, not to say it's going to rob you - even if it's what it actually does.
Any tool you can use to upload files on a remote system can be used for that. Hacking Team's tools certainly allow that but I very much doubt they have a tool specialized for planting child porn/evidence on a computer.
But then... we're so used of seeing child porn used as a straw man to increase surveillance that's it's pretty fun to see it used against one of the companies making tools to help with said surveillance. Even if it's wrong.
Of course it's just air, there's no such thing as a silver bullet diet. Health and longevity depends on so much more than just diet that there will never be such a thing.
But still, since there's money to be made by selling dummies miracle diets, there are some to sell. And since they can't sell the real thing because it can't be made, they do what they can to convince the customers that it is. Among other marketing tricks, pervert science so it looks like their snake oil is based on something more than just the will to make money from gullible people.
There might be some good science in the nutrition field. Sadly, it's drowned in a sea of wishful thinking, bad science and plain charlatanry...