pabloPXL

I wrote another async replacement for browsers, 4.1k minified. https://github.com/aynik/be

Right column, top.

FTFY: a) http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=express%20js%2C%20rub... b) http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=javascript%2C%20ruby%...

Try the standard library: http://golang.org/pkg/

This is really cool! Cannot wait for a release with private spaces!

Apple suing in 3, 2, 1...

I think both behaviors provide continuation to the problem. On one side, the people who is actually sexist, or racist, or just believe in stereotypes. In the another, the people who also believes that the rest of the people are biased towards their sex, skin color or condition. Ignoring information that is not interesting or useful for us is the best tool we have to not be hurt by other people so easily, get stronger and prepared to survive in an unfair society and preserve freedom of speech. Nobody wants to be negatively discriminated, but does somebody think positive discrimination is the solution? I believe is the same social problem after all.

That's because there is no OOP in javascript as in other languages like java or python, javascript only implements natively prototypal inheritance and lexical scope. This very important concept is always misunderstood because of the syntactic sugar like 'new' and 'this'.

Well, although simpler and less error prone, the 'self' method is quite less optimal than the prototype way. A quick test reveals that the first technique consumes much more memory (100000 new instances pushed into an array): http://imgur.com/YVkny

self: var a = []; function b(){ var c = {}; c.d = function(){}; return c }; for (var e = 0, f = 100000; e < f; e++) a.push(new b)

prototype: var a = []; function b(){ return this }; b.prototype.c = function(){}; for (var d = 0, e = 100000; d < e; d++) a.push(new b)

Never heard of anonymous image boards :?

Thanks! but I can only see it as a bad hack, as it's just grep doing almost all the dirty work :) btw I got the idea from http://zachholman.com and his boom-db...

hey I did something similar but in pure bash (plus grep and cat) :) https://github.com/pabloPXL/kissdb

Thanks! I didn't know this project and looks pretty awesome :)

Well, given that javascript was designed in somehow less time and with less resources than superior languages it has obviously some inconsistences and everybody agrees on that. On the other side if you know the language really well you can avoid the most of the problem it has. I like your point of 'keep it real' but you need to accept that the language is far from 100% correct.

Well I think that was 'designed' basically to cast any type to it's string representation. Also wanted to point that I used type coercion when is supposed to be used, and never got a bug of that nature in my code, but yes, you must get the coercion rules right from the beginning, and yes, javascript code could live perfectly with this 'feature'.

Because in strongly typed languages the compiler is able to hunt down the most of the bugs for you in milliseconds. That's why haskell programmers suggest that if a haskell program compiles gracefully, you can assume is mostly correct and bug free.

It looks really interesting!

Nice, but wasn't chicken scheme the flagship of scheme-to-c compilers? http://www.call-cc.org/

I translated it to js -> https://gist.github.com/1679611 Earned 1 line, and packed it with a cheap implementation of zip :3

I think you didn't make a fair translation from ruby to javascript there, here goes my attempt:

    function map_unless_nested(arr){                                                                      
        return arr.filter(function(it){ if (it instanceof Array) return it }).length?
            function(){ return [] } : function(fn){ return arr.map(fn) };
    }

    console.log(map_unless_nested([1,2,3])(function(n){ return n + 1 }));
    console.log(map_unless_nested([1,2,[1,2],3])(function(n){ return n + 1 }));

edit: also a translation for the last example

    function map_first_innermost(arr){
        return function(fn){
            return arr.map(function(v){
                if (v instanceof Array) 
                    return map_first_innermost(v)(fn);       
                return fn(v);
            });
        };
    }

    console.log(map_first_innermost([1,2,[1,2],3])(function(n){ return n + 1 }));

No, mainly because there is no such a place.

to install it (globally): > npm install -g jils

Created own repo, https://github.com/pabloPXL/kissdb

^ This is what I mean with my sentence, thanks :)

I know perfectly where it comes from, I have access to google too, and the quotes remarked perfectly that the quote was not yours. I was replying to your intention, not to the literal text.

EDIT: this reply actually looks more personal than I wanted it to be, and given your clarification, have my apologies...

Genius is not somebody that makes you believe that you 'need' something that you actually don't, those are mere leaders of the consumerism religion. Geniuses were people like Pitagoras, Newton, Gödel... you know, people that opened whole new science fields just with the power of their minds. Please don't insult them with your first world cheap heros.

You point out the 'silly' con remark but you do much worst, actually comparing a mere successful business guy with a whole civilization.

The problem of having 1 master plan is that you don't know whether you will ultimately succeed or not. Burning out quick ideas on the other side will improve your ability to decide correctly on your next ones. To be clear I agree with your interpretation of our fellow dinosaur's idea, but not with having an agenda that can be a single point of failure.

A very cheap, still in progress implementation in js :) https://github.com/pabloPXL/jils

create a fake one-time account? :)