owebmaster

So people are right to say he has nothing to show to back his claims.

Then when asked for examples of what they built using AI, what they have to show is boring slop worse than "git cloning" a mature project.

If that was the case they should all be in jail.

Did Ronaldo say he's never been a better football player?

> What's the complain exactly?

What complain? OP asked a question. Carmack created Doom, Quake in 2, 3 years. What has he created in 4 years of AI? Should be exceptional if one of the most productive programmers ever says it makes him more productive.

What does he have to show?

Flutter is pretty abandoned. If it's "awesome" for you still, it won't be for too long.

> And every time I wonder where the people who create these tests are looking when they're deciding which harnesses to test?

It seems we need a place where harness creators can pay for that work. There are more people talking about their own harness in this post than talking about the post.

> Today banks use $250B/year on KYC checks. You could fix the world hunger and still have $50B leftover money with this amount.

How about getting $200B from the profits to end hunger first then reduce the money spent on KYC?

That's a weird response. Both form and content.

Anyway you are wrong, the tool calls are deterministic, generating a one-shot script isn't.

100k output is a good amount. Probably read and cache are way more, to the millions.

If that's what you think, why you keep posting comments linking to your blog?

If you know that to be true and still add your links everywhere ("helping"), isn't this a spammer's confession?

Yes but only because they can actually ship the react app

There's no moderation but you feel the need to post more, not less? Sounds conflicting.

> but are you really so confident what might be possible in 10 years?

Do you think we are finally 10 years away from curing baldness?

The X account was created this year and has just one post. It's a made up story.

> "Every eighteen months, the minimum IQ necessary to destroy the world drops by one point."

That's a terrible framing. By this point it should be very easy for someone with 150 IQ but in reality they have issues finding someone to date.

Every extremist thinks their ideas are moderate and so are the ideas of the rest of extremists they support. Elon Musk also thinks his agenda is truth. Trump created a social network named Truth Social

"China made me do this" isn't a good excuse for fascism and it won't go well.

It's terribly low quality aí slop

Same way dishonest people use examples like her to attack social causes.

If Sam Altman was actually named Elizabeth Altman the OpenAI CEO would be in jail.

> Hmm, maybe I should be pro-imperialism. I’ll do that before calling a Brazilian, Canadian, or Mexican an American to satisfy the whims of the language police.

Sounds like a culture warrior

If the title is good that's enough. More often than not, the HN discussion is much more interesting.

The cotton mill proved its value long time ago. The current AI tools didn't. And a similar build up failed just a few years ago (crypto).

Why are you excluding Ireland?

> Which just turns into endless fight over wording

Sure. One side benefits the users and the other benefits a monopoly. I don't work for that monopoly but I do use a smartphone that is locked to the monopolist OS.

AI PRs aren't fine. Open a issue and propose a change, the maintainers decide what to do next with their own AI if they want.

That's a known fact. That's why the first thing doctors say to overweight people is to lose weight for pretty much any disease. Some get hurt and blame the doctors, which doesn't help them.

Helpful to whom? Google banning installing apps outside of play store is the correct story.

> Does it really take an agent that many more tokens to write Lit or regular HTML and HTMX?

Definitely not. That's skill issues. The shadow DOM can be a bit tricky.