Blindly trusting a model that's easy to manipulate is not a good thing
1,447 karma · joined April 12, 2012
Blindly trusting a model that's easy to manipulate is not a good thing
- their evidence is true (eg it's not just a too small sample size, in very particular conditions, etc)
- and MORE IMPORTANTLY that they haven't forgotten OTHER EVIDENCE which points to a much better way to do it
usually when you "see the world through metrics" you start to be very efficient at optimizing them... but then the first minute your metrics start pointing a different direction to the one it's "supposed" to (which happens to 100% of metrics since "all models are wrong but some are useful") and you go with the full speed of your optimization on the WRONG target, you start getting into issues quickly...
North [------------] 7
South [--------] 5
East [--------] 5
West [-----] 3
or something, which would have saved a lot of data/ink ratio
Meanwhile the author of the post says that "capture carbon technology is around the corner" while 99.9% of scientists say it won't work... so I let readers figure out who the clown is
Which is exactly the part that "defies common sense" and is intersting