3,609 karma · joined January 25, 2017
You've still got a problem though, now when you ask the reader to verify the rule, you have to explicitly state that they're not trying to verify the first rule.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_quadrature
It is significantly more subtle than what you are thinking.
I don't really care what you mean by leftist, but you definitely cannot claim to be a liberal and have no "paranoia" about China.
Just use Rolle's theorem. If you took calculus, you learned Rolle's theorem.
Burnout is just when you run out of burn. It's like getting sleepy. You run out of the thing keeping you from being sleepy. You gotta get more stuff to burn if you wanna burn it.
If all of your operations occur with some reasonable minimum denominator, just use ints. If not, that arithmetic is going to become unbounded really fast.
No subscription can compete with just owning the games and the hardware.
Unionizing does not result in worse outcomes for employees or new hires. Lawsuits don't raise the prices of McDonald's coffee. And stronger labor laws won't stop companies from needing personnel. It might move the needle a little, but these things are subject to more forces than you are imagining here, and most of them are much stronger than the offchance that you would need to pay to relocate someone you are immediately terminating.
Simply return to this standard, and make the penalty for non-compliance that your company is seized and auctioned.
ew
You're the one who has taken the stance that people who say "standing is bad for your back" are universally failing to account for the relative scale of the two considerations. I think it's likely that you're making a number of errors yourself when coming to that conclusion, and I would appreciate it if you would share them.