3,239 karma · joined June 14, 2019
1945 was clearly that. 1920 with the League of Nations attempted to be that, but failed.
Whatever happens after the current turbulence we can be sure that there won't be a UN and NATO and a World Bank at the end.
P.S. The first modern world war was the Thirty Year's War.
No thanks.
Akshually there is, and WW3 has been going on since 2010. (Mostly in places that aren't Europe.)
Yes, quite the smoking gun of a load-bearing phrase.
So no, we're not advancing, we're in fact regressing. The crash and disillusionment of the post-vibe-code world will be immense.
If you ask it to then prove its assertion, it will then certainly output the tokens that look like a plausible proof. It has to, as it is programmed too.
This "proof" might even be thousands of pages of very technical looking and professional sounding jargon.
It's not a real proof though, and as an artifact it is 100% useless to both the field of mathematics and humanity.
...is the fact that the people pontificating on AI and math the most are also the people who understand AI and math the least.
P.S. Google's real problem is that their web search is absolutely atrocious and completely broken. Even Qwen is better at searching the web than Google's AI search box.
And why not? It seems there is, indeed, one born every minute, and technological progress only accelerates this phenomenon.
Not really. Here in the 21st century people mostly use DAWs, and there's a piano roll inside that thing instead of staff notation.
In the linked textbook the real actual theory only starts in chapter 33, "Set Theory". (The exposition of the actual theory is pretty bad, though - zero explanation of what consonance/dissonance is, where the 12 notes come from and the reason why our particular scales exist.)
Just publish a public key in your DNS TXT records. ACME is just that anyways but with extra (pointless) steps.
The whole SSL certificate grift is just a way to extort money out of nothing.
I think spying on traffic is just a massively simpler task than generating content.
"The Internet" would require 1000 times less servers if it wasn't running off Python scripts in Docker containers in VMs in a virtual overlay network. (I'm exaggerating these numbers only slightly.)
Excel is great, but it's an arcane beast rivaled only by Emacs configs. People pass down Excel formulas by word of mouth like they're magic spells.
Is music "theory" actually a theory? Can it be used to predict or construct something? Even just a two-note steady-pulse acid bass beat. I'm not asking for much.
It's just a quirk of human physiology. The real creativeness and ingenuity comes from rhythm and the interplay of repetitive and surprising sounds. The pitches are not important.
Music theory was originally a tool for music critics in the 19th century to talk about conservatory music of the time.
There's nothing rigorous, systematic or scientific in it; it's mostly a historical cultural artifact more than anything else.
For example, music "theory" is completely helpless when describing an EDM track or how to compose one. EDM is one of the most primitive music styles ever (barely even qualifies as music in my opinion) and yet music "theory" is worthless in this case.
It's not. "Brains as electrical circuits" is a gross simplification based on our ignorance and prejudices. (In the 18th century they spoke of brains as "clockwork mechanisms".)
LLMs, in contrast, are literally next token predictors. We know exactly how LLMs work, and they are exactly that.
No amount of cope and anthropomorphizing is gonna change that cold, hard fact.
P.S. The perceived magic of LLMs comes from the way they cross-correlate all the probabilities of tokens on their context window. Not from their ability to "think ahead". They can't do that by design.
No, it's not really a given. :)
Cross-cultural (acultural?) memes like sixtyseven have much wider appeal.