1,661 karma · joined December 3, 2010
That said this is still terrible and I hope the German court reconsiders their decision. The free flow of information is more valuable than protecting copyrights, because the former benefits many more people. Most of the copyright holders who feel threatened by piracy are not even German! The court is protecting big American businesses over individual Germans.
It sounds to me like Silverstein and the NYFD were talking about pulling firefighters out of WTC7. Once the fire department realized saving the building was a lost cause, there was no reason for firefighters to remain inside and risk their lives further. I don't hear anything in the video about "pulling" the building down.
It's now cheaper for ISPs to deploy CGNAT than to purchase new IP blocks. Since IPv4 is provided for legacy compatibility, performance is not a priority.
It's extremely demoralizing to work with people who are bad at their job. It makes me feel as though my hard work is unappreciated, because someone who is not working hard gets the same treatment.
Sometimes the employee is slacking off, sometimes they are bad at their job. Either way, if their failure to contribute is bringing the rest of the team down, they have to go. Otherwise, the good people leave to get away from the bad people.
I suspect this technique is how the Imagemagick author generated the noisy twigs image: https://legacy.imagemagick.org/Usage/fourier/twigs.jpg
https://legacy.imagemagick.org/Usage/fourier/#ft_application...
The ability to break backwards compatibility has been central to the continued development of every platform. Windows, Mac OS, Android, iOS, the web, are all unable to run certain old programs. Some of these platforms offer more compatibility than others, but none offer 100%.
Most of the time, the breaking changes end up being good for consumers, especially in the long run. Change is necessary for technological progress and banning such activity would be like throwing out the baby with the bath water.
The game has been ported to modern OSs: https://github.com/avaraline/Avara/
There is a video of gameplay with commentary here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AutG8KO4DsY
I agree that intmax is silly, but I believe there are legitimate uses for variable-size types, like int_fast8_t and uint_fast16_t. These are their nominal size on x86 because the architecture has arithmetic operations for those sizes. But on POWER, they are both 32-bit types, because there are no 8-bit or 16-bit opcodes, and emulating overflow behavior with bitmasks incurs a performance hit.
>doubling wind speeds gives ~8 times the power
This describes a cubic relationship; 2 cubed is 8.
>doubling the length of the blades gives something like 4 times the power output
This describes a quadratic relationship; 2 squared is 4.
0.9^3 * 0.9^2 = 59% of the energy, much better than the 20% you claim.
Unlike Taylor's ideas, this MyNOR actually exists in the real world, which is all the more impressive considering how impractical it is.