HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

onetimetoken

8 karma · joined March 16, 2010

What a surprise to find a whole thread and blog post dedicated to the search for my identity.

I consent to a benevolent search for my identity or identities. I was quite surprised to see the speed and scale of this development - another symptom of networked life.

Some of the speculation is very interesting. It's also surprising what accidental properties of my original post(s) have come under close scrutiny when people start looking for patterns.

With the awareness of being "hunted", it's surprising how quickly one becomes more cautious about many actions. Of course, I've violated the cardinal rule of my account and used this token more than once, but part of the theory we're testing is that despite using a onetime token (to hyphenate or not, that is the question), my identitiy could still be revealed.

I feel a bit like why the lucky stiff, although his persona had merit, whereas mine is accidental. Coming next week: onetimetoken t-shirts. ;)

PS: No timestamp for you!

submissionscomments
onetimetoken··on Ask HN: How many of you founders are girls ?
Thanks, that would be my first angle of attack as well. The assumption that I have at least one other hn account is reasonable enough. Even when I wrote my first post, I was considering faking a different style/vocabulary (which is harder than it seems), but obviously, I was just using a throwaway account as a rhetorical device for emphasis.

Thanks for the exchange. :)

onetimetoken··on Ask HN: How many of you founders are girls ?
I was just trying to empasize my point. Just out of curiosity, how would you go about identifying me?

Thanks for the linked article. Interesting indeed.

onetimetoken··on Ask HN: How many of you founders are girls ?
I fully agree with the sentiment that inspires your statement.

However, this thread highlights a fundamental property of a networked life: privacy is dead, there is only identity management.

You only need whois and google/facebook to find the data in this case. Both are instances of seemingly disconnected and "local" data points (as in nobody without a real interest would ever look for these things), which, chained, intersected, etc. can reveal a ton of information about a person, all of which was volunteered by the person in question.

The NYT had a piece on "human-flesh search" recently, and 4chan raids have been well-known for a while. The point being, that once you release something in the wild, it's there, and accessible. Ethically, is it fair game to mine it (like people search engines, for example, do)?

It should give us collective pause to think - why do we get all those web services like facebook, gmail, twitter, etc. for free? Without even noticing it we are whoring out our privacy and intimate patterns. Google has two customer groups: users and advertisers - and advertisers bring in the money, users are there to maximize advertiser and google ROI - e.g. Google allows pure-ad parked pages, they give tips on "blending" ads to increase CTRs etc.

If harnessed properly, these things can be useful, but it requires a mindset and workflow not entirely dissimilar to those of spies or high-end criminals - controlling information by selective disclosure, identity segmentation, disinformation, anonymization, etc. - not for sinister purposes, mind you, but simply to guard what we traditionally call privacy.

written with a one time account