omgitsabird

Seems better with a border radius of 1.25rem. Also making the border thickness very thin seems to help, as well as some making it more oblong.

"I think its really awesome to see just how fast you can move on these things, if um... you just get a bunch of people who really want to do it"

-- Andreas Kling on this progress: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xa5_tW_eovM)

Then, not too long afterward, they forget everything.

Aren't there some hard problems on leetcode?

I can see this analogy as:

"Don't do your math homework. Instead, find hard math problems in real life to solve."

I guess I was implying that I don't view the benefits between the prior and the later as an onto mapping.

> We avoid the fanfare of Docker, as really it's not needed for Java apps; they're somewhat self-contained anyway and it created more problems than it solved.

What does this mean?

Also, those services are much more than email, so the analogy that the author is trying to build to bolster their argument doesn't really work.

Sure, but how does this system work? Especially with newer services, like ride sharing, where people use personal vehicles to transport people within these areas?

> If you nationalize housing and hold prices low, then there will be supply shortages where some folks will not be able to get housing who would happily pay your price.

If you nationalize housing, wouldn't you also subsidize supply?

How will that ever happen when delivery, moving, construction, etc are essential parts of the economy for "large parts of cities"?

yeah, there is a lot more in the last 16 years...

i too suffer from immediate references to tell me i know nothing, but we are all the same, reading the same stuff, even right here...

To preface, I am not trying to nitpick here. I am generally curious.

Is this a correct usage of amortization?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/amortization

It seems strange to imagine telling someone who isn't going to experience anything ever again anything at all.

This is interesting.

What are you looking for specifically? What does a neurodiversity program look like at a company? What, to you, makes a company neurodiversity-friendly?

Speaking of diffuse, how do you sequester something that is at super low concentrations like atmospheric methane?

As an analogy, my home reverse osmosis filter doesn't even come close to touching things that are in the parts per billion.

Also, it isn't as if atmospheric methane is evenly distributed across the globe [0]. How do you expect to collect methane across borders?

[0] - https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4798

> created by language amateurs > all of that is gone and they are still stuck with a subpar language

The argument is that the language is "awful" and "subpar" because it has "early decisions" like "multiple thousands of built-in" global functions introduced by "language amateurs"?

Sorry, but I remain unconvinced.

I agree that there are real reasons that PHP fails as a language in particular use cases, but it seems rare that those reasons get articulated in these threads.

There are a plethora of articles for "foo best practices" or "bar done right".

I feel like you are stretching a quote to fit a premise that doesn't match the context of this thread or article.

> more mature infrastructure and better language

What does this mean?

I didn't review the linked projects, but isn't the "untrackable" browser one that does not implement or spoofs most APIs?

I think it would be, for the most part, trivial to make a text-based or extremely stripped down browser on top of existing projects, if you had the contracts mapped for appropriate code generation. There are IDLs for most Web APIs, so that is a head-start.

I think this would be achievable, but not as a browser that most people would want to use.

With the right attitude, you can rip from streams and play it for free from Winamp. You can also buy a lot of music as an MP3.

> short guys looking for girlfriends, unattractive/aging women looking for husbands

These sound like buckets you created to fulfill your own subjective stereotypes.

> Doing things by myself is boring and depressing, and getting into a group of "normal" friends, of both genders, to hang out and laugh with, seems like an impossible goal.

This is a harsh thing to say, but maybe its you. You disparage people who are looking for the same thing in the previous paragraph.

> I feel that finding a non-coding job would be ultimately the best way to find new social groups

As someone who has worked many non-coding jobs, I can assure you that it is not.

You can wear a SCBA for hours. You can also find P100 cartridges that eliminate smells from VOCs and "gases".

Who is being censored? Sure people are banned from communities, but that is nothing new.

For most people, to host a blog, one can host a server at their house, through their own ISP, use the latest static website package, and share some links. It is a very low barrier to entry.

I think what people are actually saying is that they want the followers that these platforms provide them. They want to be able to push notifications and invade peoples' inboxes. They want entry into their day-to-day. You can't get that from your own host.

Justice, by definition, necessitates objectivity.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice/

Does no one else view "it just works" as an incredibly annoying phrase?

Why do you think that?

Lets say a man goes to prison for 25 years for murder, and upon release the victim's husband kills him. The victim's husband gets revenge, but is it just?

Justice shouldn't be subjective, imo.

Some want vengeance in place of justice.

That is not a universal statement[0]. They may get lower priority in many cases, but MELD[1] or a similar model is used to determine who gets priority for liver transplant.

[0] https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/destigmatizing...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_for_End-Stage_Liver_Dise...