An easy choice that you somehow managed to get wrong?
75 karma · joined November 20, 2023
An easy choice that you somehow managed to get wrong?
It's a guarantee in any jurisdiction with adequate consumer protection law.
Why is this the worst possible outcome? Companies using AI would be training with properties they own or have licensed appropriately, rather than the existing scheme of ignoring copyright law to extract $$$ from the creative works of ordinary people.
> According to one version, it says that "the kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces."
A reform of the US voting system would make elections much more competitive and greatly reduce the risk of electing another Biden or Trump.
More importantly, don't let this dissuade anyone from helping. Some caution is needed yes, but cynicism is the greater foe. A life of public service is a life well spent.
What is this? The essay is littered with these awkward family guy-esque jokes that do nothing to illustrate any point.
Junio never claimed to be infallible though
Licensing wasn't so much a problem in the early days of Minecraft. The first really popular server mod (CraftBukkit) not only provided binaries, but deopfuscated server code on a GitHub repo (since DMCA'd): http://github.com/bukkit/craftbukkit. That repository was ostensibly licensed as LGPL, but no one really believed that, given it was derived from Mojang's proprietary binaries.
Mojang eventually acquired CraftBukkit and hired their devs. And there's an interesting footnote: for several months, Mojang didn't tell anyone they'd acquired CraftBukkit, and they kept making releases to the public GitHub repository. Given it was Mojang making these pushes, I believe (IANAL) that they are officially-licensed LGPL versions of the Minecraft server, albeit ~10 years out-of-date now.
Regular intuition: switching doors doesn't matter, you have a 50/50 shot either way.
Counter-intuition: probably just check out the wikipedia article, there's a few different approaches.
This author considers "all the data in the world" to be the truth. Yet what society considers true changes over years and decades. The danger of unleashing such an AI is that it will throw the brakes on human progress and privilege the opinions and works of people alive today, to the disadvantage of the generations to come.
But tampering with image generation like this is nowhere near sufficient. If anything it sets AI safety back by making it seem so ludicrous
Pregnancy, maternity, marriage, civil partnerships and gender re-assignment are usually chosen by individuals, not forced upon them.
BSD, MIT, several others. Without a license you cannot read the code.