207 karma · joined October 16, 2012
That aside, it looks very interesting!
It's entirely possible that your model is way off and you get results that don't mean anything. With computational models, we can test hypotheses (the models in our heads) much faster (don't have to wait for the worms to grow up) and much cheaper (we can do it on the computers all of us already own).
There's also this, which is part of the project above: http://www.cell.com/abstract/S0092-8674(12)00776-3
The problem is you need to know about tons of stuff before doing anything useful with it. For example, you need to know the biology of M. genitalium (or even what the hell it is) and you need to know at least a little bit about how the biology works (i.e. what is the metabolome? etc.). Then you need to know enough about software to be able to install and get everything running (often with poor documentation). Sometimes you need access to expensive software like Matlab.
So I guess that means it's coming, but very slowly and only for people who are in the field, not DIY biologists.
This is actually something I'm interested in working in (once I get to grad school).
It also seems pretty trivial to set up Wolfram Alpha on here. From what it looks like, you'd just have to: 1) get a developer account at Wolfram Alpha 2) download this promising looking module: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/wolframalpha/1.0.2 3) integrate it into Jasper (create a module)
I'll be sure to try it once I get it set up.
Research is hard and not everyone can do it. Progress on diseases will be slower than progress on new forms of entertainment (or productivity, as many startups are geared towards).