62 karma · joined February 6, 2019
He added that it offered to carry on working with the four main companies affected by the switch, saying “You just have to bear some of the r&d costs. And they were like, ‘No, no, we're gonna do something else’. Which is fine.”
I want to clarify that nobody ever approached us (env0) from Hashicorp.
Read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wordmark for more details
(disclaimer - env0 founder here, co-lead the OpenTF initiative)
That is why OpenTF is on its way to CNCF. To ensure it stays OSS forever.
There is a difference between "true OSS" like K8s, OPA, etc and "temporary OSS" (backed by a company) like what Terraform used to be, Pulumi, GitLab ,etc. Those can be changed in the future.
When developers chose OSS, they should consider if it is a CNCF OSS or a vendor backed OSS. What Hashi did is an important example.
(disclaimer - env0 founder here, co-lead the OpenTF initiative)
#opentf
I think Gruntwork's blog explains this the best - https://blog.gruntwork.io/the-future-of-terraform-must-be-op...
I wanted to let you know about a new podcast which focuses on Terraform and other IaC. First few guests include founder of Infracost and founder of Aquasec (trivy/tfsec). Great more guests are coming soon. You can check it out here - https://www.theiacpodcast.com/
I hope you like my podcast. Would love your feedback and ideas about future episodes/agenda.
Ohad.
Then you must check out the #terratag open-source