Yeah indeed, and if web development prefigure anything for wasm, we can expect apps to quickly have a lot of dependencies built in. I guess we'll get used again to "please wait, loading" screens :)
1,547 karma · joined June 15, 2011
I've just tried on a go binary that was 2.4MO. After building it with `go build -ldflags=-s .`, it's 1.6MO. After stripping with upx, it's 480ko (and still works, and has panic stack traces).
Go binaries, being static and embedding the whole go runtime, tend to be quite big. Now, I don't care about it because 5 or 10MO on my server filesystem is nothing. If I ask every visitor to download 10MO before running my webpage, that will be a problem, though.
Is this something we will have to deal with? Or will this be a lesser featured go implementation?
Bind9 has a poor reputation because of how difficult it is to use it to define zones (manage a domain name), but if you want to use it as a resolver, it's basically plug'n'play.
Huge bonus included : if you want to flush the cache, you just need to run `sudo rndc flush`, so you don't have to wait for TTL timeout to test your newly configured domain name when you setup a website (you still have to restart your browser, because most of them do their own dns caching).
It's been really accurate for me, providing news about things that are not especially "mainstream", like word embeddings, anything related to KDE or updates on games I'm currently playing. I do a lot of searches on my phone, maybe that's the reason.
Maybe someone will come later with a idea to make this while preventing abuses (maybe browsers could built it in as a mean of payment?).
I've been massively annoyed with the obsession of making the code look exactly the same in every of its parts. Ten years ago, I could tell which of my coworkers wrote a piece of code based on its style only. It was not especially needed, given we had git (and svn before that) to tell who authored a piece of code, but it was pleasant to recognize this or that developer's style. It was not radically different styles, we were still agreeing on tabs vs spaces and how many spaces, it was more subtle. We were authors.
But now that we psychorigidly don't want to see two pieces of individuality in the same codebase, be it as syntax or sometimes even as methods preferences to achieve a task, such tool as prettier or gofmt are incredibly useful. At least, we don't waste time on that.
godet is the lib I use for chrome piloting, replace with your favorite one.
Regarding the "way of life", I find it funny it's considered a problem while I know so many friends, who nobody would say they are not integrated, who live just the same. They do seasonal winter work in tourism in mountains, seasonal summer work at beaches, and travel in between with their home/truck to visit friends and family, or just visit new places. I know three of them who have been living that way for 15 years, and nobody finds anything to say about it (except parents, of course, who would like to see them have "a real job").
Are you sure, deep inside, there is absolutely no problem of racism implied in your problems with rromas? (no need to answer this question, that's more something to ask to yourself)
Regarding difference between rights and expectations, there are two layers, there. There is the laws that apply to anyone with the rights that apply to anyone, and the laws that apply to citizen and the rights that apply to citizen (which rromas are not, most of the time). I'm not a lawyer, but I would tend to think the laws most often apply to everyone and the rights most often apply to citizen, except for basic decency. There's an exception regarding the laws : when a law makes mandatory for a child to go to school, it is usually only about citizens' children.
Now, we could certainly ask more of those people to disband mafias and enforce human rights. But I'm not under the impression it's what we try to do, in europe. What I see most of the time is attempts to push them away and to hell with them.
I hear a lot about how this or that part of the population "doesn't integrate". What I never hear about is why it's so important they integrate.
But please note it's not a complete fix either. You still have third parties you must trust (presuming others decentralized exchanges are built like stellar's one). Instead of having one third party for all markets, you have one third party per asset.
When you buy xrp for xlm, for example, you don't actually own xrp, you own credits for the xrp anchor, with the promise you can withdraw them. So it's exactly like current exchanges, except if one anchor gets hacked, it does not affects all assets, just the one it manages. That's still better than current situation, and decentralized markets have many other advantages.
Some alt based sequences are really useful:
* alt + e, a : leave current parenthesis and continue inserting (eg, while typing parameters for a function)
* alt + shift + a : insert mode at the end of current line
* alt + shift + i : insert mode at the beginning of current line, with indentation
* alt + p, a : paste before current position, and continue inserting
Maybe there's a modifier key with a similar behavior on macosx?
There's one thing I would ask from manufacturers who go the bluetooth-only way, though: please first make sure a bluetooth receiver can handle multiple connections.
I have bluetooth speakers at home that I've put on top of my sofa, so I can watch movies comfortably without annoying neighbors with loud sound. During the day, my phone is my media center, playing music. But I also want sometimes to play sound from my computer, like when I watch a youtube video.
In order to do that, I plug the speakers' jack to the phone, and connect the laptop through bluetooth. This is awesome and is better than jack only speakers: I can easily plug two devices on it. But if everything was bluetooth only, then it would be a regression, as I could only connect one device.
Could bluetooth multiplexing be a thing? (or are there reasons it couldn't happen?).
I would also love to know if I'm an edge case, or if other people here are doing something similar as well.
A note about debating skills, though: from the second year (at least in my university), we were asked to try to explain why someone is right, rather than why they're wrong. I found this shocking at first, especially because teachers were making us study the authors they loved and then ask us to explain why they were right. It sounded like brainwashing, at first. But later I realized it was actually the best skill I learned there.
When you're discussing an author, a developer's work, almost any kind of work, really, you're basically taking 10 minutes of your attention to refute work that took maybe years, or even a life. Most likely, the objections you'll have will be superficial and author/creator will have figured them for a long time. Starting first by trying to understand the goal and the reasoning of author/creator allows to really take advantage of their creation. You may then refute it if you still have problems with it :) (but you'll almost always have a cool idea or two to take away, so it's not lost time)
But is this project really overlapping it? I see mostly fish as "UX" centered, while oilshell - as far as it's stated here - reminds me more of powershell (I found the idea of having a modern language behind it so cool when it was released, too bad it wasn't my ecosystem): looks like oilshell is targetting scripting more than UX.
Anyway, I love the idea of having several shells who try to have a new look on what a shell is.
EDIT: oh, btw, let's not consider no significant scripting can be done with bash, just look at the incredible work from dokku team ;) https://github.com/dokku/dokku
It was a pleasant surprise to realize it was so much easier for us to write specs and discuss issues and possible solutions on github together. We were just more used to think on "paper" and to articulate our ideas by writing them, which allowed us to be really comfortable doing async work and to communicate complex ideas.
It was really appreciated, among all those "hum... I'll call you, it will be easier".
Poloniex has many USDT markets, as they use it to compensate for the fact they do not provide markets against fiat. As such, those markets have way more volume.
The market visualization and analysis tools website tradingview.com offers a computed charts of USDTUSD from poloniex (symbol: POLONIEX:USDTUSD). It tells a whole different story than kraken charts: https://www.tradingview.com/chart/?symbol=POLONIEX:USDTUSD . Basically, usdt is stable there.
There's still a problem here: tradingview does not tell (afaik) how they are computing this price. I would assume they do a mean or average of various BTCUSD markets on several exchanges, then check it against BTCUSDT on poloniex, or something like that. But I don't know any official explainer about it.
Buying in ICOs still doesn't provide any kind of clear value (beside selling them) and issuing tokens could be used to do way cooler things (like issuing state branded cryptocurrencies, or temporary currencies for big events, etc). It's kind of sad that ethereum is mainly seen nowadays as "the cryptocurrency for ICOs", I wouldn't want to see that for stellar too.