568 karma · joined January 16, 2015
The past tense structure makes it sound like progress has been made on this front while it’s still the same problem presently. It’s just that those tools in particular have been deprecated (and not replaced)
You can’t have your cake and eat it too
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-strike...
https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/summary?cid=...
Using face positioning vs the accelerometer is interesting, but without seeing it in action, is it that much more compelling?
Wouldn't the next logical course be for IOUs to convince legislators of outdated/inefficient infrastructure, thus paving the way for infrastructure plans that provide tax benefits as well as real dollars to replace existing infrastructure. This would let the IOUs 'skim off the top' to provide profits on this upheaval for investors?
Where municipalities are unconvinced that they need new infrastructure either through insufficient budget or other reasons, IOUs could convince regulators that stricter environmental limits are required, forcing municipalities to pay for the new infrastructure, usually by allowing utilities to pass that cost on to consumers by tacking on additional charges to subscribers bills.
Seems like a prime environment for this to happen -- if the proper cogs were greased in this direction.