248 karma · joined May 8, 2019
If you are talking about the personal responsability of Elon Musk by misleading the public into thinking his cars have anything close to a self driving car, I agree. If autopilot is not autopilot, then why name it as such?
Retroactive taxes should apply here, what was written in the law was wrong with the actual intent of the lawmaker, we shouldnt encourage this stupid cat and mouse games, just pay your taxes.
Are you serious? Honest question.
>we should be making efforts to massively reduce consumption across the board Why? Theres no problem with the consumption of renewable energies
When you want to trample on people's freedoms just because you dont deem them "worthy" of consuming energy its no wonder that people gives you the finger.
The only legitimate criticism here may be that energy prices dont account for the externalities of carbon emissions. But thats irrelevant of how the energy is actually used
This is even worse than the OP
Not necessarily, the point of crypto is to reduce reliance on fiat money, due to the high fees of crypto it makes sense to build centralized services on top backed by decentralized cryptocurrencies, these exchanges dont hold real power, as you can just switch exchanges (unlike credit card processors). Bitcoin is like the internet gold, but you dont buy stuff with gold.
The person who "earns by investing and working in both nearly equal proportion" doesnt really exist beyond outliers, this is empirical, the 1% owns as much wealth as the entire middle class, this is where their yearly income comes from,they get money because they own stuff, not by being superworkers, otherwise the inequality wouldnt be growing.