nsvd2

Where I live (major city) because of zoning there are few apartment buildings and basically 100% are only for rent, not individually owned units. So if you want to own where you live it must be a townhome or detached house.

In fact, being able to "play the game" so to speak is probably part of what the interviewer is looking for.

I've always been interested in Fossil, especially how they handle all the things in a project that aren't strictly code but still need to be tracked.

It's pretty clear to me that these systems have a massive potential for intelligence agencies as people move more and more of their internal thought process to an external tool.

And, of course, intelligence agencies are good at realizing potential.

I think Arch is a great general purpose distribution because it doesn't try to hide anything from the user - all the details are right out in the open. That and excellent community documentation.

I usually find the exact opposite, where for Windows I can sometimes find a few SEO optimized pages with vague instructions, but for Linux I'm much more likely to hit a wiki or forum with in-depth technical information to solve my problem.

Strongly agree, and this makes Linux head and shoulders above Windows for everyday computing now. Because it's more text-native than Windows and in-depth technical documentation is more easily available, AI agents are simply more capable on Linux.

Spyware wouldn't help at all because you could just put the AI between the computer and the monitor, for example, or use a VM.

The short answer is that presumably people are willing to pay for it

Well, yes, but that's another way of saying the same thing. If the US can't pay and is forced to devalue their currency, thus tanking the value of your investment, you lose money. Therefore, the likelihood of this drives interest rates up.

There are bleeding edge and rolling release distributions. Debian is simply not that and has no desire to be.

FWIW I'm in the US and I bought mine. Renting does seem to make more sense here as the gown has no utility outside of this one event.

This is an old joke, but as AI becomes more and more capable it becomes increasingly likely that the government will have some kind of intelligence sifting though every post you make and message you send.

Assuming you're talking about Taalas, they have a live demo for inference on their HC1 chip.

I run Gemma locally on a 3090, it's amazing how useful it is to be able to call out to ollama in a bash script or cron job.

I think it obviously will, what would be the benefit to spinning up more than one copy?

If they do that, they lose market share to their competitors, which kills their ability to raise investor capital, which kills the company, because they are almost entirely funded by investor capital.

Seems like this is not a connection of laws but a glossary of terms.

They're saying that SPY is up 12% over the past month despite the Iran war. The stock market is not the economy.

Why so? It seems both things are true.

I prefer his comment to yours, does that mean new accounts should be weighted higher for me and lower for you?

For maybe people, even one would be too many.

They probably make interest off it themselves, so to give you any interest would cut into their margins.

In my experience Rust and Go are both opinionated languages with strong types which makes them work well with agentic coding.

That is indeed a very annoying part of many AI models. I wish I could turn it off.

Already is in Nevada.

While I'm certainly no supporter of casinos, I think that online gambling is a difference in kind.

Given the extent to which the copyright system has benefited corporations and publishing companies to the detriment of individual authors and the general public, I'm constantly surprised that it still has many apologists.

I usually relegate the agent to code, I do the git part/put the patch together. Git is an excellent tool to review the changes granularly and find potential weaknesses.

I've come to the point where, if the agent makes a wrong assumption about the code base with fresh context, I consider that the code is not obvious enough about it's intent.