Exactly! My thought was that backups, or porting from one version of Foundry to another would be as simple as copying the `content` directory since everything user-generated lives there (admittedly inspired by Wordpress' `wp-content`)
20 karma · joined June 19, 2024
The hardest "no" so far has been a request to change the license from AGPLv3 to MIT
That might not sound like a huge deal, but most of my previous FOSS projects have been MIT licensed, and with this one I want to keep the expectation that modifications to the core remain available to the public under the same license terms
I did carve out explicit exceptions around a boundary: third-party themes and plugins are not intended to be pulled into the copyleft scope. I spelled that out in the repo alongside the license in the LICENSE.*.EXCEPTION files
> website looks way too AI generated IMO
The docs? Yeah that and the base themes were all from AI-generated scaffolds that I then wired into the project with the SDK - UI/UX is not my forte. Hopefully I can either hire a proper designer in the future (at least for the docs and default theme), or a designer in the community decides to help with the project
Hypothetical, but when you have a single block of 10 buildings, each housing 500 people - the trash generated is a lot and if each were to have their own dumpster parked outside, where would cars or delivery trucks park? If parking is allowed between the dumpsters, how would the trucks access those dumpsters? There's no room to park them off-street because the buildings typically abut next to each other without alleys in between.
That's without even mentioning that even if multiple buildings share a dumpster - then you run into the question of how do you deal with illegal dumping? How do you bill each building for trash removal? See: "The Absurd Problem of New York City Trash" by NY Times (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/03/02/upshot/nyc-tr...)
No paywall version: https://archive.ph/XFAFg
Discussion on that article: https://www.reddit.com/r/urbanplanning/comments/1b5i1xk/the_...
A study: https://manhattan.institute/article/innovative-waste-managem...
What I'm trying to get at is that the trash problem in NYC, and any proposed solution, raises a lot more questions than anything else.
I for one, would love to see Amsterdam inspired under-sidewalk bins (https://www.core77.com/posts/102208/Amsterdams-Smart-System-...)
I honestly would have thought readers here would have been better at picking this sort of stuff out.
https://omid.dev/2024/06/19/advanced-shell-scripting-techniq...
https://omid.dev/2024/06/19/advanced-angular-change-detectio...
https://omid.dev/2024/06/18/haskell-monads-functors-and-appl...
They all end with: "Happy coding!", "Happy scripting!", and "Happy Haskell coding!". For some reason, when you ask ChatGPT for a blog post about coding, it'll always end with "Happy coding/scripting".
I run a similar blog, and there's a lot more massaging I have to do post-query to get it into a more "human-like" state (removing any match to "Happy%" as last line, expanding certain sections, etc). Also, all of the blog posts are about the same length - which is a dead giveaway if you don't ask it for a variable length.
The script I wrote that does the query changes topics/categories at random, and assigns a random length between 2000 to 4000 words, then it does paragraph length detection and re-queries when a paragraph is not-long-enough. Does a few more things like updating the Front matter and adding some times to the Front matter (this linked blog also runs on Hugo with the hugo-coder theme by the looks of it lol) before outputting to the markdown file.