1,178 karma · joined September 12, 2010
Whenever you provide legal advice, you take on risk. And big or small, there is always the possibility that that risk might end your career and cause years of training to go up in smoke.
Lawyers are experts in risk management, which is why you see them trying to minimize risk and exposure in every way possible.
(Lawyer here.)
(Apologies if this seems like a stupid question. I've not played games for a very long time, mainly because most stuff doesn't seem to be available on Macs).
That said, I completely agree-a $4/month DO VPS can run MySQL, and should easily handle this load; in fact I’ve handled far bigger loads in practice.
On a tangent: any recommendations for good US-based bare metal providers (with a convenience factor comparable to OVH, etc)?
Edit: and what’s the best practice here? Is it using a key management system of some sort? (I’m thinking of scenarios where you might need to deploy your code + secrets on a remote server, say to authenticate with a third party API)
Interpreting X-rays in isolation has little relevance to actual clinical practice.
Best benefit of all: being able to ditch the intrusive crap Adobe forces on you when you install their stuff.
In the '90s (or early 2000's?), I remember seeing a photo of Stallman Jesus on the left arrayed against Bill Gates on the right, with Stallman being the figurehead for the open-source coalition arrayed against the might of Microsoft. I've not been able to find that photo since though.
Re: the lawsuits—yes, the barrier to initiate litigation is low (in most countries); but in my experience, most folks only start litigation when they feel significantly wronged.
Problem is, given the difference in cultures (something you pointed out earlier), an act by the company that is perfectly standard in the U.S. might be interpreted very differently by someone from another country.
Consider this situation: you hire a contractor. They work for you for several years, and then you fire them. The contractor goes to the labor court in their country and files a claim stating that, yes, their contract says that they are an independent contractor, but no, since you've employed them "full-time" for several years continuously, they are a defacto/de jure employee. (Which is a valid argument under the labor laws of certain countries)
What will you do:
- Spend the time and money refuting their claim? (You need to find a good lawyer in that foreign country; lawyers are expensive; and someone on your side needs to spend their time coordinating with them)
- Ignore the claim? (Not a good idea if you ever want to visit that country in the future)
The claim itself might be nonsense; that's immaterial. You're faced with a Hobson's choice if said contractor drags you to court.
(Addendum: this is why I made the point that labor law is local. When you hire a national of a foreign country, in general, you subject yourself to the jurisdiction of the courts of that country for labor related disputes.
I am not sure if a clause in an employment contract stating that the agreement is governed by U.S. law would be accepted by a local court; and even if it did, in litigation, you'd most likely have to represent yourself before the local court to make that objection.)
2. Taxation regimes. These too vary by country, and add compliance and operational costs.
3. Other laws (both U.S. and foreign) that make hiring foreign nationals complex in certain situations, e.g., ITAR.
When considered together, these costs and operational obstacles can be significant.
https://espadrine.github.io/blog/posts/chinchilla-s-death.ht...