There's an argument that even under capitalism, a lot of jobs still only exist in order to keep people busy.
2,069 karma · joined June 28, 2021
There's an argument that even under capitalism, a lot of jobs still only exist in order to keep people busy.
In reality everyone who's thinking about having kids exists on a spectrum of what's possible: either it's going to be really easy for you (because you're Elon Musk and you don't give a fuck) or it's going to be borderline impossible (because you're infertile, or you're broke, or whatever).
Just because someone looked at the odds and said "you know what, maybe this isn't a great idea" doesn't make them selfish. Meanwhile you're the one imposing your worldview on them...
Must be nice. Claude and Codex are still a waste of my time in complex legacy codebases.
[0] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/14/business/energy-environme...
Sometimes.
You lost me here. Come back when you're proud of it.
This sounds fucking awesome.
- McCabe (Kurt Russell), Vanilla Sky
- 'Microservices' sketch by Krazam
My name isn't Russ. Russ Ackoff was a business process optimization leader from the last century -- a contemporary of Deming and the Toyota school etc.
AI won't take a shoddy process (say, your process for reviewing and accepting forms from patients) and magically make it better if you don't have an idea of what "better" actually entails.
"Improving a system requires knowing what you would do if you could do exactly what you wanted to. Because if you don't know what you would do if you could do exactly what you wanted to, how on earth are you going to know what you can do under constraints?"
- Russ Ackoff
Learned a new word, thank you!
Perfect is the enemy of good; dependency cooldown etc is enough to mitigate the majority of these risks.
This is an oxymoron.
see also: react hooks
This is because LLMs trend towards the centre of the human cognitive bell curve in most things, and a LOT of humans use this same problem solving approach.