8 karma · joined June 26, 2012
Something that helps in this regard is travis-ci. It's a free CI server and if you have at least some level of testing, you have some level of confidence.
But, then I realized the findings were biased. The major players, HP, Dell, Acer, Asus, Lenovo, etc. obviously have more lobbying power. Two things stood out specifically:
1. The mention of OEM vs. white box. That is to reduce sales at Newegg, Tiger/CompUSA, the myriad of mom and pop stores, etc. only. No good comes of that. If you really were trying to do good, you've provide the most reliable and least reliable component types/manufacturers, although I know they would never do that, as they piss off everyone but the guys that came in #1.
2. There should be enough data on SSDs now to see some trends in reliability, even if the numbers are small and the variability is much higher. I assume that this was left out because the major players want to switch to SSDs because they provide a much snappier experience, but the context of the study was reliability, and there are a few scary things about SSDs in terms of reliability: the first is that when they die, they die hard right away with little warning, and because of that, the life is shortened; the big players hope this issue will resolve itself over time and in the meantime they'll just cater to the upscale market that buy computers more often and might not notice the reliability as much. Despite this, I still love SSDs and will continue to buy them, but it should be reported.
But back to the site at hand, I think it is a neat idea, but I don't have time to text with people I don't know about politics, because I work, have a family, and am old enough not to waste much time on politics. I wasted many hours of my life trying to convince others about the perils of fiscal liberalism, and the best I was ever able to do is to point people to the Peter G. Peterson foundation: http://www.pgpf.org/Issues.aspx