notanotheracc

> In this case, it's not; but even if it were, does that limit the ability of a text to explore interesting themes? Why?

In this case, it does. You can't have a show about a pedophile's redemption while simultaneously appealing to that demographic.

Let's not act like there's any consensus in the "scholarly literature" — if you could even call the writing of some guy with no credentials that.

> they will manage to convince you the thing you like is actually bad, which doesn't benefit you

I'd argue that there is benefit to re-evaluating one's tastes based on new information. It's always good to think critically of the content you consume.

EDIT: Wow. Can't even post comments on a new account. Not gonna beg dang for approval in his e-mail so I guess that's it for me and anyone else who's privacy-aware.