The author of the linked post, JuvenalUrbino, contributes a great deal imo.
342 karma · joined August 12, 2022
The author of the linked post, JuvenalUrbino, contributes a great deal imo.
Btw, the US/NATO sabotaging that pipeline isn't exactly a crazy idea.
NetBSD is great. For such a small project they accomplish a lot.
I'm happy to support a company like that obviously, but it's still frustrating.
>Is FreeBSD more suited to daily consumer laptop use? I use Arch btw
It can be, it depends on what you use your laptop for. For example, if you game, maybe sticking with Arch is for the best. Bluetooth is supported on Free and NetBSD, but I haven't used it on those os's. EDIT: FreeBSD supports bluetooth, but support might be spotty/depend on how old/new the hardware is. On Free/Net, bluetooth also seems less straightforward ("user friendly) than on linux or commerical OS's like MacOS.
Since you're used to arch, installing, configuring, and maintaining FreeBSD shouldn't be too difficult. Try it in a VM for a while until you get used to using vs linux.
iirc, when they went to implement it in OpenBSD, it was decided the bluetooth stack was basically just too poorly implemented and not really secure. I think if we ever see bluetooth in OpenBSD it will be a rewrite by some of their devs; basically when one of them decides to scratch an itch.
Portability, pkgsrc, some neat innovations, and a small and welcoming community. I'm not qualified to judge this, but they also value code quality and security.
There's no qemu equivalent on mac I don't think.
Mine too! I would say it all depends on use case. If OP has certain tasks in mind they should maybe invest in something more powerful/newer. Having said that the t430s is a solid machine.