6,360 karma · joined May 14, 2017
I think that one issue with private security guards using body cams is that there's even less guarantee that you'll get exculpatory evidence from them, as they will just delete stuff that paints them in a bad light. The police at least have procedures in place to reduce the likelihood of that happening, though how well it works in practice, I don't know.
I am in no great hurry to change the word though. It's not something that comes up much outside of extremely technical contexts, and whilst it's a bad word, its regional character and multiple meanings kinda make it fine. It's not like it is being used for the meaning that's offensive, the meanings have unrelated histories (and the offensive one is much newer).
I don't think it would be right to change an ordinary English word because it sounded similar to an offensive word in a foreign language, and I think that's essentially what's happened here.
I would be a strong advocate for some regulatory framework requiring an effective right to access human support for businesses exceeding a certain size.
Sometimes they can serve as a useful intake system for collecting information before passing someone off to an agent, but even then they tend to be less useful than just filling in a form. I think in most cases, a step by step form followed by a live chat would be better.
Unfortunately there is a segment of the population that is completely incapable of filling in a form. These people should probably be passed off to human beings, but then those human beings are wasting their time dealing with similar issues constantly.
LLM chatbots are even worse. They have great latitude to say convincing and incorrect information, but can rarely actually do anything. It would be much better to just publish a good knowledge base.
I would say a pet peeve of mine is when you do end up having support staff that are human beings, but are not empowered/trained to actually solve customer problems sufficiently. From a business perspective a chatbot is a great replacement for that, because it also regurgitates a script without actually having to action any business processes.
The fees are still astronomically high even without the ads program.
You can also chat to the person and see if they're knowledgable about their stuff. Depending on the craft, the person might actually be doing it in front of you (or customise their goods somehow).
You can also see if your local arts centre/university/whatever has some kind of market. There's also usually different kinds of conventions for specific industries where people will set up booths.
What that means is that any artists/makers that are doing volumes that represent anything even close to a full time wage are totally shafted. If I were an artist selling stuff, I would strongly consider a switch to something like Shopify, especially as you then aren't on a storefront sitting next to a whole bunch of drop shipped garbage.
Restaurants are one of the few areas of the market where local businesses that are deeply connected to their communities still thrive.
There are plenty of restaurants & pubs near me who recognise me as a regular customer by name. The people at those places genuinely enjoy making their customers happy. It's much easier to care when your customers are living, breathing human beings with names you know whom you see frequently. The same can't be said for McDonald's, but there are places that aren't so soulless.
Just make sure you don't use a file format which supports history (such as PDF).
If you have to redact with black boxes, the safest way is to redact-rasterise-OCR. That obviously breaks some stuff though and degrades your document quality.
I use Siri all the time to set reminders and alarms, to control devices, and to change buried settings like auto brightness etc.
What I care about is responsiveness/latency and accuracy, not having the thing pass the Turing test.
I've heard this argument loads of times in the US, and it's clearly based on a belief that taxes should add friction so people understand how expensive they are.
Most other countries have gone the other way and decided that transparent sticker pricing is more important than people understanding that their taxes are separate from the price of goods.
Perhaps I've just been so personally burned by how complicated US compliance is from outside (form 5471 and friends being a personal boogeyman of mine) that I've missed that it's quite easy to do business inside the US. I am aware that you have to do stuff like file as a foreign business if you do business between multiple states.
I don't like that you have to pay a private monopoly company (Intuit) to stand a chance of being compliant with your tax obligations over there.
N.B. the distinction between startup and small business.
The US is not a very friendly place to run a small agency or an artist's studio - here in the UK it costs a few pounds to register a company (or nothing as a sole trader), and doing accountancy and compliance is WAY easier. It's fairly simple to employ someone in the UK, but it's hard in the US without a league of accountants and lawyers behind you - hence why stuff like Stripe Atlas exists. I wouldn't run a business in the US with revenue below 150k.
Even a current homeowner might want to move one day, and if house prices uniformly fell by 50% relative to current earnings, they would find themselves more able to upgrade their house. The only people it would hurt would be people moving from owned accommodation to rented accommodation or cheaper owned accommodation.
What am I misunderstanding here?
EDIT: It seems I was forgetting a key fact: mortgages. When people hold a mortgage and their property value goes down, they can be left holding the bag.
In the UK and other European countries, particularly regarding consumer goods or other kinds of contracts with an inherent asymmetry of negotiating power, there are lots of things you can’t agree in contracts, such as disclaiming general fitness for purpose and safety.
Deciding that you can’t agree away your rights to redress through the judicial system seems like a reasonable extension of these kinds of rules.
In the EU, in order to have a legal guarantee of being treated as the same as a handwritten signature in all member states, you have to meet "Qualified Electronic Signature" level, which means cryptographic signatures and the involvement of some kind of trust services provider who validates the certificate used to sign. In practice this is rare, and ordinary electronic signatures a la Preview work for most things.