People who want to talk vacantly about an unfolding event will do so, and will not read articles like this. If social media adepts see a signal:noise problem, they know how to create new channels. That's the whole point of the internet.
1,165 karma · joined April 18, 2010
People who want to talk vacantly about an unfolding event will do so, and will not read articles like this. If social media adepts see a signal:noise problem, they know how to create new channels. That's the whole point of the internet.
Also, I'd love to know how the presence on staff of someone whose job it is to relay concerns from PR agents to journalists from a separate publication "is just one means we have of ensuring editorial integrity on Moviefone".
Who are you including in that category apart from Apple? Compatibility with 30-year-old OS features is often considered a worthwhile goal among current UNIX descendants.
> I see very few people complaining that Apple killed the PowerPC line, and XP far predates that.
Is WinXP compatible with x86 and x86-64? Is Win7 not compatible with those? I don't see what point you're making by mentioning CPU architectures. And the 'universal binary' made this switch largely transparent to owners of either CPU.
> many people hold the misapprehension that XP is 'good enough' in some sense
Leaving aside the accuracy of this, surely if it is a misapprehension then it should cause problems only for those people. Instead Microsoft have made it clear that it's a problem for their own profit growth and that those users need to be coerced into upgrading.
But even that's being done in a half-assed way that makes it more of a problem for web developers. Which other Microsoft titles are being developed to be XP-incompatible? Certainly not Office 2010. Aside: backwards compatibility was largely maintained under Mac OS Classic from 1984 to 2001. The break, coming with OS X, was necessary, not contrived.
[1] http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/IEBlog/2011/Feb/uellr-imag...
I would like to be able to just try it out instead of asking basic questions but first I would have to make a Windows 7 VM etc. etc.
Downvotes.. interesting. What I mean is that I'm not sure what is going to make it 'major' within the near future. They tried converting the Gmail userbase once before.
Right. Real-time remote collaboration is novel enough to be able to say that not only interfaces need to be developed for it but also behaviours, etiquette, metaphors -- culture. You could see this with Wave. They were so desperate to hold peoples' attention that they came up with all these new and slightly silly words to help people conceptualise what it was they were suddenly able to 'do'. Too much. Too soon. Too not-for-you-to-determine.
Meanwhile an idea that anyone on the street can easily formulate (shared text editing) is still not widely available in a usable form. It's like promoting the Twitter API and ushering everyone into a new world where everything is a tweet and a tweet is everything, before you have a working tool for personal subscription-based SMS distribution. All these other 'features'... they're not. They're proposed desirable activities. Whether or not they're actually desirable is a cultural development, not a software development. Until people begin to take living, multi-author, simple documents for granted on a large scale, it's really too soon to say if it's a good thing that Bob can embed a sudoku game in the agenda draft or whether a poll and comment thread is a good way to decide where to have coffee or just a bit weird actually.
What this data shows is that lots of people are giving these films a chance (and paying money to do so) who aren't really that engaged with the genre, or niche. That's a big validation of the studios' design strategy for the films.
An illustrative example I can think of that isn't in the top 20 is District 9: a very familiar 'niche-y' core genre, a fairly predictable plotline, but with enough influences from other genres to keep a diverse audience interested. The Dark Knight would probably be another.
The vast majority of criticisms like this one are based on short term concerns related to a given state-of-play in the market. Concerns like the ones that killed Linux stone dead back in the '90s, web standards in the mid-2000s, and *ndroid.
Note the distinctions: open source, platform agnostic, solves a real problem.
Counterexample: http://blog.phono.com/2011/02/17/how-to-build-a-voip-based-b... (browser-based VOIP, Flash under the hood)
Bizarrely, Chrome has support for speech input on text-based forms which translates microphone input to text on their servers, but it doesn't expose direct access to the audio. Argh!
Even odder is that there's no mention in the piece about the long-raging battle with Yahoo over the Overture ad-bidding IP, a huge achilles heel for Google at the time which somehow just melted away 10 days before the IPO (but 4 months after this article).
Compare Microsoft, whose monopoly positions are relatively brittle. As we see with IE9, if Microsoft slips to even 66% market share (that's the current US market share for Google Search[1]), they need to start thinking seriously about interoperability. An advertising monopoly is something much more fluid. I think Google would have to majorly drop the ball to get toppled in the medium term (maybe failing to respond to an extreme price challenge over several years from a large rival network, or some really catastrophic privacy blunder).
[1] http://comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2011/2/comSc...
The rise of “so,” he said via e-mail, is “another symptom that our communication and conversational lives are chopped up and discontinuous in actual fact, but that we try in several ways to sew them together in order to create a continuous experience.”
I hear it a lot in radio interviews, like..
A: And it was around that time that you discovered that 8 is greater than 7?
B: So, next we started looking into relationships between single digit numbers, which...
It's like a disguised sense of alarm that the partner in the dialogue may have ruptured the narrative (which is what interviewers are paid to do, politely) and that continuity needs to be reasserted. It's necessary with technical subjects where if you don't introduce concepts in careful sequence then the meaning completely breaks down.
And yet yesterday I had someone call me up after I provisioned them with a Google Apps account and the link above (Google Apps's Settings screen links to the IMAP version of it). They thought they had to set up a Gmail account first because all the screenshots show 'username@gmail.com' instead of 'username@myappsdomain.com'. The screens were also alien to them because they showed a different OS version.
This is definitely fixable. I like the idea.