That's true. My wife is from Tajikistan, she called her mom and asked about that Malaysian airlines flight that got shot down, and it was like they were speaking two different languages. She goes 'did you hear about that plane that Russia shot down' and her mom says 'oh you mean the one that Ukraine shot down because they thought it looked like Putin's plane?' we were quite confused about what she said until we watched the Russian news and they had a completely different story. The Russian news agencies are state actors, and that's all they ever were.
What was great about these is that they had functionality. It was the start of client side web-apps. I think without that contest website, a lot of these great creators wouldn't have gotten the recognition that they have now.
Yes, that is 388 lines, however, the title makes reference to the chess engine itself. The rest of the code, such as setting up the board, handling moves, and ui, are not specific to the sunfish implementation, they can be used without the engine.
That's most likely the reason. You should have a filter and a bio-filter. You never change them both at the same time. The bio-filter harbors bacteria which neutralizes the fish urine. Yes, it will not seem 'clean' but it doesn't matter.
Anyway, you should change out the water a bit at a time. Imagine that the water is water in a glass. If you let it evaporate halfway, and add more water, then eventually that water will get cloudy as the concentration of minerals increases. Minerals don't evaporate, so that water gets more and more concentrated minerals. You have to remove about 10% of the water a week and replace it, to keep the water normal. You could also use distilled water, which I've had success in starting a new tank, but if you do clean out a tank, don't clean the bio filter and you need to let the new water sit for about 24 hours to let the chlorine dissipate.
>Change in chlorine?
Uh, there shouldn't be any chlorine in a fish tank. You and your roommate should probably look up fish care in google or something. The first link is to ASPCA and they do have good advice. I had an aquarium for several years, and if you don't know what you are doing, mollies or perhaps a plecostomus is a good choice. The pleco can survive pretty nasty water. However, they can grow pretty large and they would need a huge tank. They live about 10 years or more, so it's a big commitment. On the plus side, they will clean the sides of the tank.
Another thing I noticed when looking through my comments, this service bills itself as 'your personal assistant who never sleeps'. If they are US based, I don't see how unless they have people working a night shift.
But you're also seemingly forgetting that cars these days are very safe, with airbags, seat belts, crumple zones, roll bars... this whole 'should it kill you' is not likely an issue these days. Look at all those idiots who crashed their cars going 80mph and lived to tell about it (tesla for example). The point being that if a car controlled the crash, your chances of survival are far better. So it's an option of killing someone or having a controlled crash, not 'kill or be killed'.
I'd say that in the example given in the article, the best decision would be to slam into the side of the tunnel instead of hitting the child. It makes no difference the age of the child, since if they are laying in the road, there's a high likelihood that they will be killed and moderate likelihood that you' be deflected enough to be seriously injured or killed as well by choosing the 'through the living being route' since that particular case is fraught with uncertainty, the most logical choice is a controlled crash. Since cars these days have airbags and crumple zones and such things, it's hard to hit an inanimate object and get killed in such a vehicle. And with car insurance, and unlawful death lawsuits in practice, it seems the financially responsible choice is to have a controlled crash. So to all those saying there is no 'right' answer, you are generalizing the problem too much. The question as stated in the article, not generalized to all situations, but to the situation as it was stated, seems clear.
>Do you think it's something a non-designer could do?
Picking an ugly font that has to be huge to be legible and providing too much empty space and padding? Yea, I can do that.
That particular case, the colors make the text not so hard on the eyes, but the font itself is just awful at that size, it may be interesting in print, but on a webpage it's just too jumbled and it's certainly not very legible. You wouldn't want to read a book written in that font.
Click on the 'features' or 'bootstrap' on that page, and tell me you don't spot something wrong.
Also, where does the magenta color come in? I see it nowhere in that theme...
I think it's great that you are working on making something like this, I'd love to tell my computer 'give me something gloomy' and then 'but not too dark' and it would generate and iterate until it got something I liked. I just don't think it's quite ready for primetime. Unless of course you are just looking for feedback on the themes. In that case, I'd suggest you open up the comments on each theme page and allow rating anonymously.
I can see it working maybe, but still, it seems like you could just put something up on CL just as easy, and nobody is going to pick up your stuff and return it, they will just pick it up when they buy it.
Well, because chances are they gave the job of renewing the certificates to the rookie, and he may not have known how to do it, or raised the issue multiple times and nobody knew the implications of it. I know the last place I worked at, I mentioned that the certificates were expiring, and I needed to pay to renew them, yet they didn't seem to care until our customers couldn't connect anymore.
From what I've seen, it looks like it's not quite working. As far as I can tell, it takes a range of numbers, picks something random in between, and calls it a day. Most of those themes that I saw make me want to hire a designer because they look like something I could do myself (and I am awful at design).
I think the issue is that your machine learning doesn't seem to know what goes together and what doesn't. It may focus in on a small subset, but then it mixes and matches elements that don't go together. Like it's not seeing the whole picture, more it's taking certain elements from 'good pages' and jumbling them all up. If it randomly produces a good design, how are you sure that it's not an exact copy of one of the training designs?
When you say 'machine designed' I imagine a designer going through and intelligently choosing colors, photos, font sizes and dimensions because they went to school, they know what looks good, they have a good education. What designers have worked in your toolkit to produce these, and where did you learn design? If this is intelligently designed, I would like to know more about the process. From what I can see, I understand why designers get the money that they do.
>Streaming has not only changed the way our members interact with the service, but also the type of data available to use in our algorithms. For DVDs our goal is to help people fill their queue with titles to receive in the mail over the coming days and weeks; selection is distant in time from viewing, people select carefully because exchanging a DVD for another takes more than a day, and we get no feedback during viewing. For streaming members are looking for something great to watch right now; they can sample a few videos before settling on one, they can consume several in one session, and we can observe viewing statistics such as whether a video was watched fully or only partially.
I wouldn't say that this makes you wrong, but I'd say you are partially right.
Web2Py is a python-based website, like django, but it's a bit different. Since you say you are passing an authentication header, I don't see how it could work with Sandstorm, since it wouldn't really be used as a one-user app anyway.
That's pretty amazing how quickly I can install and use an app. It's instant as far as I can tell. This makes me wonder - how difficult would it be to take a sandstorm app and migrate it to the internet? And how difficult is it to migrate an app to your platform?
I remember reading about this concerning Netflix. They used to have a competition on who can come up with a better recommendation algorithm. They eventually decided not to implement the best one because what they were getting was good enough, and since most people were streaming instead of getting a dvd, the more recommendations the better. They could just try and if they don't want to see the whole movie, rate it and instantly pick another.
Nope, the last time I went to one, it was just closer to my house, and more convenient than McD's. Just luck of real estate really. Their claim of 'flame broiled whopper' just doesn't make me want to go there. Who cares if it's flame broiled or cooked on a stove, it's a burger. And if you can't cook the onions before you put them on the burger then you're just lazy.
I did see them in Russia, several places, and the only thing they had going for them was that there was no waiting. Because nobody EVER went there, that I could recall.
Refuse. Do you have a problem saying no? Why are you not setting boundaries? If your home life is important to you then you need to speak your mind. Tell them 'No, I dont want your promotion, I will be going home at a reasonable time to my family'. Is that so hard? Here's another tip - accept remote positions, and remove any business education from your resume.
You don't even need a loyalty card. Match up the amount and time of the charge to the in-store inventory system, and you can be about 99% sure that you are correctly matching the person's card to their purchase. If the store scans a UPC, then that UPC is in their system. Sure, the receipt may just print 'candy bar' but the UPC says 'Butterfinger 2oz classic bar'.
The only way I can see this as profitable is at a huge markup or they start stocking items themselves just like a grocery store does. I think people care less about what grocery stores the shopper goes to than getting the correct items. They should just have a food warehouse and stock stuff.
I don't like the hamburger. Not on a desktop. On the desktop that symbol doesn't have any meaning. And that fixed bar at the top doesn't make sense either. If I want, I can press the 'home' key on my keyboard to go to the top of the page. So it doesn't need to follow my screen and flicker when I scroll. If I am reading content, I rarely interrupt my reading to skip around. I don't need that stupid nav bar taking up my reading space. Another thing, if I am on desktop, and I have to scroll when I click on your burger, then your burger menu is too long (in this case its too big. I'm not blind as a bat, I can read smaller text).
>He then gave an example of another new artist who said he’d have to sell 1 to 1.5 million records with his current record deal to make $1 million. With Ryan’s system that artist could make $1 million with only 10,000 customers — only 1% as many customers.
I'm pretty sure that math is wrong in the article.
$1mln for 10,000 customers means $100 per customer? for an album? Who pays $100 for a small time artist's album, much less a digital download.
>Distribution isn’t hard. If you’re selling apps instead of albums, then you’ve probably already got the skills to set up your own store front.
You might have the skills to setup a store front, but chances are you wouldn't do it well, unless you've built several store fronts.