3,667 karma · joined October 13, 2009
One could call it metrics-driven development.
Edit: the site is accessible for me again at 14h30, Eastern time.
This is my own experience. The teams that spent the most time on standards usually had the least pressure, in terms of things like deadlines. Once the focus of the team shifts to having to ship things, there is less time to worry about having 100% code coverage (to pull out an arbitrary number), and so forth. Code review can slip into flagging only things that really matter, and leaving nitpicks for another day.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russian-documents-reveal-...
While I would not phrase it so harshly, I understand the point. But looking further down the road: I worry that if we encounter a virus that truly does threaten the entire population, that we'll end up in a permanent, North Korea-like state. The precedent has been set for this by the Covid-19 experience.
Most major countries have some kind of scheme in place to fix agriculture prices. In the case of the US there are subsidies that everyone pays, via taxes.
The same NSA that has vacuumed up phone and internet data, including that of US citizens?
Demonstrably false. The US alone is over 50,000 deaths. This is already worse than an entire year's toll for the flu.
Are you going to claim that the numbers are fake? In that case, perhaps conveniently, no one can claim to be right.
Some people. We have to be careful not to frame the discussion exclusively from our own, respective positions. I'm very fortunate, for instance, to be able to work from home very easily. This is not the case at all for many. Some have seen their hours increase if they're in the "essential" (a word I hate, but it has become the norm) job category, and/or have taken on risks to their health. Many have lost their jobs entirely.
The reduction in pollution is good. Don't get too used to it.
>Calm down.
That wasn't necessary.
>I'm not "pushing" anything, certainly not UBI.
You may not be, but there is no question that there are many who are, and that's why this thread exists.
>Are you against discussions?
You've assumed something else about me, I guess?
A lot of people who are in favour of some kind of intervention right now aren't necessarily going to want to turn this permanent.
I think that is a very charitable interpretation of what they're imposing, though it may not have been your intent. Rather than "guarantee rights", I think it is just an attempt to assert their powers as governments. Hence the push to collect taxes on internet services, break encryption, and so forth.
But yes, we're heading toward an increasingly-balkanized Internet.