> Yes. Saving time is good. > No, as a news reader I prefer accuracy to speed. As a news reader I care about information coming directly from a source rather than summarised. As a reader I want easy access to a source of information and not have to go through a hoop of using another website/app. As a reader I want to read on mobile/laptop interchangeable and with the same interface. As a reader I want to take in deep knowledge and not summaries. As a reader either I a) read high density articles deeply and do not want a summary or b) read low density articles quickly and do not need a summary.
If so, are there current solutions?
> Yes, see other comments.
If so, are you able to do this cheaper or to a higher quality than the current solutions?
> Find the cost of other services and compare that to the cost you can deliver this solution at scale to actual users. > Find a metric to compare your services accuracy/speed to other peoples solution. > X-axis; quality. Y-axis; cost. Plot all the solutions. Is your cheaper for some level of accuracy than a competitor? That’s promising!
If so, how can you get this packaged to users?
> mobile, web > premium sources and pay walls > reader apps
Just a few stray thoughts. A friend and I worked on something very very similar. Ultimately we stopped as we found that no one really wants to use this and pay for it. It’s “cool engineering” but people like reading just fine. Also tweets exist! You can find summaries easily that are human created and better synthesis.